The Housing Secretary seemed to act “within the guidelines” by visiting his elderly parents, a health chief has said.
Paul Cosford, emeritus director of Public Health England (PHE), said it sounded like Robert Jenrick had remained within the four “clear” guidelines by travelling 40 miles to deliver medicine and other essential items.
Shadow home secretary Nick Thomas-Symonds said it was “very important for public confidence” that Mr Jenrick explained himself, but that if the Housing Secretary had delivered medicine to his parents, “clearly … it fits within the four exceptions”.
While the Government’s guidelines state you should not visit anyone who lives outside your own home, including elderly relatives, you are allowed to “leave your house to help them, for example by dropping shopping or medication at their door”.
Mr Jenrick previously defended his decision to visit his parents – saying in a tweet: “For clarity – my parents asked me to deliver some essentials – including medicines.
“They are both self-isolating due to age and my father’s medical condition and I respected social distancing rules.”
The Daily Mail reported that Mr Jenrick had travelled from his residence in London to a “second home” in Herefordshire during the lockdown – which he told the paper was what he considered to be his “family home”.
He is said to have travelled to his parents’ house in Shropshire from the Herefordshire address.
According to his website, the Housing Secretary lives in Southwell, near Newark, as well as residence in London.
Speaking to BBC Radio 4’s Today programme, Mr Cosford said: “Our guidelines are quite clear – I’m not going to comment on any individual whoever they are – but our guidelines are quite clear.
“We need to stay at home except in one of four different circumstances.
“One of those is to take exercise once a day with people from our household, one is to do essential shopping for food and medicines and that does include helping to get those to other people where it is absolutely required and there isn’t another way of doing that, one is essential health care and then the fourth is about being able to go to work if you’re in an essential job for the response or you absolutely cannot do your work at home.
“I can’t comment on Mr Jenrick, it sounds as if what he did was within one of the four guidelines to me, but others will obviously have to think about that more.”
Also commenting on Mr Jenrick’s actions, the shadow home secretary said: “I think that’s for him to explain. The delivery of essential supplies like food and medicine to vulnerable people, vulnerable family members, would be permissible in the exceptions.
“It’s very important for public confidence that Robert Jenrick explains himself and why exactly that journey was necessary.”
Mr Thomas-Symonds also told BBC Breakfast: “There are the four reasons for leaving your house. One of them is to deliver essential supplies to vulnerable people.
“Clearly if that is what Robert Jenrick has done, then it fits within the four exceptions. It is for him to answer precisely what the purpose of the journey he undertook was.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel