US attorney general William Barr has said the investigation into Russian meddling in the 2016 election began “without any basis” and was intended to “sabotage the presidency” of Donald Trump.
Mr Barr told Fox News Channel’s Laura Ingraham that Mr Trump had “every right to be frustrated” with the probe which led to his impeachment “because I think what happened to him was one of the greatest travesties in American history”.
The FBI launched its counterintelligence investigation into ties between the Trump campaign and Russia “without any basis”, the attorney general added.
He said: “Even more concerning, actually, is what happened after the campaign, a whole pattern of events while he was president. To sabotage the presidency, and I think that — or at least have the effect of sabotaging the presidency.”
Mr Barr has appointed a US attorney to lead a criminal investigation into the origins of the probe led by former FBI director Robert Mueller.
Mr Barr, serving in his second stint as attorney general, has sought to paint himself as an independent leader who would not bow to political pressure.
But Democrats have repeatedly accused him of acting more like the president’s personal attorney than the attorney general.
Mr Barr has proved to be a largely reliable Trump ally and defender of presidential power.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel