Nigel Farage is facing calls not to field Brexit Party candidates in Labour marginals after he abandoned plans to contest those held by the Tories at the last election.
The Brexit Party leader has insisted the “difficult decision” to stand candidates down, amid fears it could lead to a hung parliament and a second referendum, had put the country “on the best possible course for future success”.
And it was reported he refused to rule out a further withdrawal, even though he vowed in a column for The Daily Telegraph that the party would focus on fighting every Labour-held seat.
Asked if he might “back-pedal” and not challenge Tory candidates in marginal seats, Mr Farage was quoted by The Telegraph as saying: “I have just taken 48 hours to make this decision – allow this one to settle first.”
According to the Financial Times, Mr Farage said: “I’ve not considered this at this moment in time. But there isn’t much time.”
And The Sun quoted senior Tories, including Iain Duncan Smith, urging the former Ukip leader to back off.
The ex-Conservative leader told the paper: “It’s a good start but if they want to deliver Brexit they’ve still got to focus on the fact that if they divide the vote they’ll let Labour in.
“He’s going to have to go further. This is a game of two halves — we’ve had the first half and now we’re going to have the second half.
“The second half is where he gets to decide which seats he stands down from, and he’s going to have to stand down from some of them.”
Mr Farage’s announcement on Tuesday was welcomed by the Prime Minister, who said it was recognition that only the Conservatives could “get Brexit done”.
But opposition parties said the move showed the Tories and the Brexit Party were now “one and the same”.
According to BBC’s Newsnight, the decision came after a message from the Brexit Party to the Tories that Mr Farage needed a public declaration on two issues – that the transition period would not be extended and that he would negotiate a Canada-style free trade deal with the EU.
Writing in The Telegraph, Mr Farage said he saw “a chink of light” when he viewed the video posted on Twitter by Boris Johnson at the weekend.
Mr Johnson said he would not extend the planned transition period beyond the end of 2020 and that he would seek a “super-Canada-plus” style free trade agreement with the EU.
Writing in The Telegraph, Mr Farage said: “Now, The Brexit Party will focus its energies on fighting every seat held by Labour, which has betrayed more than five million of its voters, and all the Remainer parties.
“If we can win some of these seats, our presence in parliament will keep Boris Johnson honest and help to deliver Brexit.
“I have no great love for the Tories, but I can see that by giving Johnson half a chance we will prevent a second referendum. To me, that is the single most important thing for Britain. No matter how it is achieved.”
But Liberal Democrat Brexit spokesman Tom Brake, responding to the reports that the pro-Brexit European Research Group held talks with the Brexit Party over Mr Farage’s decision to stand down candidates, said: “These talks show that Nigel Farage is pulling the strings behind the scenes. He is the puppet master in Boris Johnson’s Brexit horror show.
“Every vote for the Conservatives is a vote for an extreme Brexit agenda backed by Nigel Farage.”
While campaigning in Hartlepool on Tuesday, Mr Farage claimed he was offered a peerage last Friday.
“Ridiculous – the thought they can buy me, a high-paid job; but I’m not interested, I don’t want to know,” he told the Daily Mirror.
Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn said Mr Farage’s move could pave the way to a US trade deal, giving American pharmaceutical companies access to the NHS.
“One week ago Donald Trump told Nigel Farage to make a pact with Boris Johnson. Today, Trump got his wish. This Trump alliance is Thatcherism on steroids,” he said.
Asked if Mr Farage may pull out more candidates, Benyamin Habib of the Brexit Party told Newsnight: “This wasn’t choreographed. I think this was a decision that was come to after great consideration by Nigel.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here