The Duke and Duchess of Sussex’s project manager has asked a local council not to make public landscaping plans for their Frogmore Cottage home due to security reasons.
A part retrospective planning application has been submitted to the Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead Council, but “national security” concerns have prompted the official to request they remain secret.
Recent royal accounts revealed £2.4 million was spent on Meghan and Harry’s grade II listed home near Windsor Castle, turning five properties back into a single residence for the couple and their baby son Archie.
The amount spent was heavily criticised by the organisation Republic, which campaigns for an elected head of state, but all fixtures and fittings for the home close to Windsor Castle were paid for privately by the duke and duchess.
A letter which appears to have been written on paper headed “Royal Household Property Section Windsor Castle” by project manager Ian Ratcliffe to a council manager responsible for enforcement and conservation has been published by the MailOnline website.
The project manager writes: “We consider that national security could be compromised if public access is given to the plans, other drawings and documents relating to this project, either in the offices of this council or on the council website where they could be viewed and copied.”
It is understood the application for external landscaping is an amendment to a previously submitted plan and the work is being funded privately.
Under planning law a retrospective planning application is needed if a change is made that requires planning permission.
If it is refused the local authority can issue an enforcement notice requiring the changes to be reversed.
But it is likely the team carrying out the work on Harry and Meghan’s home have been keeping the local authority aware of any changes and the application is a formality.
Frogmore Cottage, which is owned by the Crown Estate, was a gift from Harry’s grandmother the Queen.
A Buckingham Palace spokeswoman said: “The letter that was submitted to the council, and the language that was used, is standard for planning applications for all royal residences. In keeping with the usual process, the details are not released for security reasons.
“This was an amendment to a planning application which was previously approved. The work was privately funded.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here