Targets for reducing greenhouse gas emissions in Scotland are the “most ambitious in the world”, according to experts.
Earlier this month, the Scottish Government agreed to a target of net-zero emissions by 2045.
It followed recommendations set out by the Committee on Climate Change (CCC) that Scotland meet the target five years ahead of the UK in 2050.
Speaking at Holyrood on Tuesday, representatives from the CCC told MSPs it is a “critical moment” for targets to be set in order to combat climate change.
In its report, the CCC indicated that Scotland has greater potential to remove pollution from its economy than the UK overall, and therefore concluded that the country could credibly adopt a more ambitious target than the UK.
Professor Piers Forster, a CCC member, said: “Some other countries are considering quite similar targets but I think we can say with confidence that the 2045 target for Scotland we set is currently the most ambitious in the whole world.”
As part of the work towards achieving the goal, Scotland will also aim to reduce emissions by 70% by 2030 and 90% by 2040.
Chris Stark, CCC chief executive said setting such a target would be a “fundamental step”.
He added: “We don’t have that much more time to achieve these kinds of targets.
“The luxury of looking at it, thinking we have decades and decades of time, will soon evaporate.
“So setting a target like this at this moment is quite a fundamental step.
“This is the moment for us to do as fundamental a piece of work as we can on this so that parliaments up and down the land can make the right decision.”
Mr Stark told MSPs that the the possibility of setting an earlier date for the UK, and for Scotland had been considered.
However he explained that setting an earlier Scottish target would be less likely to be met.
“Any date prior to 2050 for the UK and prior to 2045 for Scotland carries a huge amount of risk of failure,” said Mr Stark.
“There are physical and real barriers to achieving it and those things are not easily fixed, even over a time period of 25 years.”
The CCC chief executive added that by adopting ambitious targets, Scotland and the UK can have a positive influence on other countries to decide to take similar measures.
He said: “A rich, industrialised economy like Scotland, like the UK, setting a target as ambitious as this gives a much stronger platform for the EU to actually set the target that’s been proposed by the Commission.
“I think we can feel much more confident about the world getting on a better pathway if we approach it that way.
“The counter-argument is, if we don’t do it, it would be very easy for other parties, especially the EU, not to do it as well. So this is a really critical moment to set a target like this.”
At the SNP conference last month, First Minister Nicola Sturgeon declared a “climate emergency” and said that Scotland would continue to “lead by example” on tackling the issue.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here