Residents and businesses in towns without any banks face “substantial financial hardship”, according to a report.
The study was carried out by Cambuslang Community Council after three bank branches closed within 18 months of each other in the South Lanarkshire town.
Between 2016 and 2017, Clydesdale, Royal Bank of Scotland and TSB all announced closures, leaving Cambuslang without a bank.
Our submission to the Scottish Affairs Committee Inquiry into Access to Financial Services is now published on the House of Commons website. Read our report 'What happens when a town becomes unbanked?' on the damage done by bank closures in Cambuslang at https://t.co/9NafhYTAct pic.twitter.com/lfcA2S7KR3
— Cambuslang CC (@CambuslangCC) April 3, 2019
The report noted the decisions were in part due to a fall in the number of bank transactions and an increase in the use of mobile and online banking.
The community council claimed none of the banks had consulted with them or any other community organisations and did not carry out the required impact assessment of the potential effects of closing branches.
A total of 420 Cambuslang residents and 85 businesses responded to a survey conducted as part of the study to gather views on the impact of the closures.
It found more than 70% of respondents felt the closures had a major negative impact on them.
Around 65% also said they had found accessing cash difficult since the branches had been closed.
Findings in the study also highlighted a largely negative impact on businesses, with more than 60% of people saying the closure of branches had caused them to shop less often on the town’s main street.
The report’s co-author Professor John Bachtler, said: “The findings from our research in Cambuslang include heart-rending accounts of the financial hardship being suffered by people who are least able to deal with the consequences of branch closures – the elderly, the disabled, benefit recipients, those with caring responsibilities and those on low incomes.
“The banks are worsening social exclusion rather than reducing it.
“Further, the closure of bank branches is undermining UK and Scottish government policies for town centre regeneration.
“The evidence from Cambuslang and other towns is that branch closures lead to people shopping elsewhere and a loss of trade for unbanked main streets.”
At Westminster, the Scottish Affairs Committee is conducting an inquiry into financial services access, with a decline of ATMs across the country cited as an area of key concern.
The report has been submitted to the committee, with its authors calling for a statutory obligation on the banking sector to ensure a minimum weekly banking service in all communities.
Professor Bachtler added: “Government has taken a far too permissive role in allowing communities to become unbanked.
“There are many challenges facing our towns and communities that we can’t control, but branch closures are not one of them.
“Policymakers need to live up to their social obligations, and the banks needs to deliver on their promises.”
A Scottish Government spokeswoman said: “This survey clearly demonstrates that there is a continuing need for cash to be readily available to all, and people in our communities need to know that they have secure, free access to cash to allow them to go about their daily lives.
“This is also vital for these local businesses, such as hospitality businesses, that continue to rely, at least to some extent, upon cash for transactions.
“We support calls to protect the ATM network, especially in areas already affected by previous and proposed bank branch closures, where ATMs provide a life-line service to consumers and small businesses.
“There needs to be a long term, sustainable banking service for all communities and the Scottish Government will continue to work with banks to ensure that essential services remain accessible to all.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here