No-one reported the video of the Christchurch terror attack while it was being streamed live, Facebook has said.
It was 29 minutes after the video had started – and 12 minutes after it had ended – before the first user flagged up the footage, the social media giant said.
The company earlier revealed that it had removed 1.5 million videos of the attack worldwide in the 24 hours after the shootings, 1.2 million of which were blocked at upload.
Facebook and other social media firms have come under fire over the rapid spread of the footage across the networks and around the world.
In a blog post on Tuesday, Chris Sonderby, vice president and deputy general counsel at Facebook, said the video was viewed fewer than 200 times during its live broadcast.
“No users reported the video during the live broadcast,” he added.
“Including the views during the live broadcast, the video was viewed about 4,000 times in total before being removed from Facebook.
“The first user report on the original video came in 29 minutes after the video started, and 12 minutes after the live broadcast ended.
“Before we were alerted to the video, a user on 8chan posted a link to a copy of the video on a file-sharing site.”
Mr Sonderby said Facebook was “working around the clock” to prevent the video from appearing on its site.
Meanwhile, the Global Internet Forum to Counter Terrorism, formed by tech giants Facebook, Microsoft, Twitter, and YouTube in 2017 to tackle the spread of terrorism online, said more than 800 different versions of the video have been added to a shared database.
The group said the “digital fingerprints” of visually-distinct videos were included, in a bid to uncover and remove edited videos that aim to get around existing detection technology.
“This incident highlights the importance of industry co-operation regarding the range of terrorists and violent extremists operating online,” it said.
New Zealand Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern has called on social media companies to take responsibility for ensuring that such content cannot be distributed or viewed on their platforms, saying they are “the publisher, not just the postman”.
She told the country’s parliament: “There is no question that ideas and language of division and hate have existed for decades, but their form of distribution, the tools of organisation, they are new.
“We cannot simply sit back and accept that these platforms just exist and that what is said on them is not the responsibility of the place where they are published.
“They are the publisher, not just the postman. There cannot be a case of all profit, no responsibility.”
In the UK, Home Secretary Sajid Javid told social media companies “enough is enough” in the wake of last Friday’s shootings.
Reacting to a tweet from YouTube claiming that the video-sharing service was working to remove the footage, he said: “You really need to do more @YouTube @Google @facebook @Twitter to stop violent extremism being promoted on your platforms. Take some ownership. Enough is enough.”
Damian Collins, Tory chairman of the Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Select Committee, called for a review into how the footage was shared and “why more effective action wasn’t taken to remove them”.
And Downing Street said social media companies needed to act “more quickly” to remove terrorist content.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article