Universities in Scotland could lose hundreds of millions of pounds worth of research grants if there is a no-deal Brexit, the UK Government has been warned.
Academics who have applied for grants from the European Research Council (ERC) are due to find out if they are successful on April 8, but the Government has not explained what would happen if the UK leaves the European Union without a deal by then.
Universities Scotland, who represent the Scottish higher education institutions, have said that life-changing discoveries and leading researchers tackling some of society’s major health and environmental challenges could be left in limbo.
The UK was the most successful country in the last round of ERC Advanced Grants, with 66 applicants awarded up to 2.5 million euros each – a total of €155 million (£133 million) in funding.
In Scotland there are currently six ERC funded projects, worth up to 15 million euros (£13 million).
Now Universities Scotland want the Government to pledge to cover the potential future funding in the event of a no-deal Brexit.
With the UK currently due to leave without a deal on March 29 unless EU leaders agree to delay Brexit or a deal is agreed by parliament, both Universities Scotland and Universities UK are calling on the UK Government to clarify the situation.
Alastair Sim, the director of Universities Scotland, said: “Scotland punches well above its weight in research that changes lives and drives industry, yet in a few days we could find a vital source of funding cut off.
“In terms of research, a no-deal Brexit will be a remarkable act of self-sabotage from the Government.
“We call on the UK Government to commit to underwrite this grant funding.”
Professor Dame Janet Beer, president of Universities UK, added: “Researchers at UK universities doing life-changing work remain in the dark over what will happen to their current ERC applications or where they will go in future for funding if there is no deal.
“Without clarity very soon vital research could be disrupted which would be hugely damaging to people’s lives.
“The UK also risks losing some of our brightest minds to other countries, if they don’t know how their research will be progressed.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here