An MP has urged shows like EastEnders and Coronation Street to stop using outdated language in family breakdown plotlines.
Siobhan Baillie, a Conservative MP for Stroud, has said she has become concerned about how arrangements for children are being shown as a "battle to be won" when relationships break down.
A former family law solicitor herself, Ms Baillie said that shows needed to move on from adversarial language to help educate people.
She highlights a plot in EastEnders, where Phil Mitchell had a so-called “custody battle” over his son Raymond, and another in Coronation Street involving Fiz Stape and Tyrone Dobbs.
What did Ms Baillie say about this in Parliament?
Speaking in Parliament, she said: “Who does not love a good on-screen relationship drama? Lovers falling out, marriages breaking down and dramatic affairs of the heart are the stock-in-trade of film, soaps and the media.
“But when children are caught in the middle of storylines, we routinely hear ‘I’ll see you in court’, ‘I’m going for custody of little Johnny and little Sarah’, or the possessive ‘She’s my daughter’, and divorce is described as a battle to be won.
READ MORE: EastEnders' Jake Wood, aka Max Branning, may 'make soap return'
“I am often found shouting at the telly when they get the terminology wrong.
“I am going to write to the producers. Language really matters in family law.”
Ms Baillie has written to the producers of Coronation Street and EastEnders about this.
She said that about 280,000 children see their parents separate each year with about 40% of all separating parents taking issues about their children to the family court.
To reduce some of the problems with this she advocates for mediation and alternative resolution options to help out families.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here