Military personnel could be drafted in to replace ambulance drivers and firefighters in the event of strike action, the Government has said.
Earlier in the week it was announced that 10,000 ambulance workers in England and Wales are set to walk out, whilst the Fire Brigade Union is balloting its members.
Around 2,000 military personnel, civil servants and other volunteers from across the Government have been preparing for such an event.
The Cabinet Office said they included up to 600 armed forces personnel and 700 staff from the Government’s specialist Surge and Rapid Response Team.
Additionally, personnel could come into ports and airports in the event of strike action by Border Force staff.
This preparatory action comes as many different unions strike in December, with the RMT set for several dates in mid-December and postal workers walking out on many dates in the build-up to Christmas.
What did the Conservative Party say about the strikes?
Conservative Party chairman Nadim Zahawi said ministers were determined to minimise disruption from industrial action in the weeks ahead.
He said he was “absolutely conscious” of the difficulties many workers were facing due to the cost of living crisis, but the country simply could not afford inflation or above-inflation pay awards.
Mr Zahawi claimed rising prices were being driven by higher energy costs to the ongoing Russia-Ukraine conflict and he appealed to unions for unity.
READ MORE: More than 10,000 ambulance workers have voted to strike over pay
He said: “This is not a time to be divided. We have to come together to, I hope, send a very clear message to Mr Putin that he can’t use energy as a weapon in this way.
“If you chase inflation or above-inflation pay then you will embed inflation for longer and hurt the most vulnerable. This is not a time to strike, this is a time to negotiate.
“To ask for a 19% pay rise (for nurses) which would cost the NHS £10 billion I think is the wrong thing to do right now.
“If you accept all the inflation-level pay rises, that is about £28 billion. It would cost every household just short of £1,000. That is unsustainable when we are trying to be fiscally disciplined.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel