Sending all children of all age groups back to school on 8 March is likely to increase the Covid R rate to “around 1”, according to a member of the UK Government’s Scientific Advisory Group on Emergencies (SAGE).
Boris Johnson confirmed on Monday that all schools in England will reopen on March 8, two weeks after he outlined a road map to lead the country out of lockdown.
Professor John Edmunds told BBC’s Andrew Marr that it might be safer to send children back to school in gradual phases, rather than all at once.
The scientist also said that everyone, including children, needs to be vaccinated to prevent a “significant risk of a resurgence” of Covid-19.
What is the plan for getting children back to school?
The Prime Minister confirmed that the date for all children to return to school is set firmly for 8 March on Monday
Despite concern among many teachers over a full scale return to classrooms, the Government is pushing for it to happen early next month, followed by a gradual easing of other restrictions in the months that follow.
Some have expressed concern that, if schools open too soon, the rate of virus transmission could begin to rise once again, which could lead to further restrictions or even another lockdown further down the line.
‘Safer to take smaller steps’
Professor Edmunds said the UK is in a “really good position” currently. However, he added that it might be safer to open primary schools first, then secondary schools later.
He said: “Obviously I’m just sticking to the epidemiology rather than other needs. Of course there’s great needs to get our kids back in schools as fast as we can.
“But sticking to the epidemiology, yeah, of course, it’s always safer to take smaller steps and evaluate”.
The professor also said that he believes children should be vaccinated “as fast as we can”.
He said: “I have two children myself, they are in secondary schools and I think that there has been major disruption at schools and there will continue to be major disruption in schools until we have vaccinated our children.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article