The owners of hotel chain Premier Inn have warned that up to 6,000 jobs could be lost as a result of low demand due to the coronavirus pandemic.
Whitbread, who own the company, have said they expect demand from customers to “remain low in the short to medium-term.”
The announcement comes days after the the firm reported that sales were down 38.5 per cent in August.
Why are Whitbread cutting so many jobs?
While demand has been relatively high in seaside and resort towns since lockdown measures were eased, the number of people booking hotels in major cities has reduced significantly, largely due to a reduction in international tourism.
With major restrictions on travel and socialising in place over the last few months, the hotel sector has been one of the worst hit, and without any sign that things will return back to normal soon.
In looking to axe as many as 6,000 jobs, Whitbread is expecting to lay off about 20 per cent of its entire staff.
How will the company decide which jobs to cut?
Whitbread says it expects some of the 6,000 cuts to be found through voluntary redundancies.
The company’s priority is “to ensure that the process is fair and that impacted colleagues are supported throughout.”
In a statement to the stock market, the firm said: "With market demand expected to remain at lower levels in the short to medium-term, we have now taken the very difficult decision to announce our intention to enter into consultation on proposals that could result in up to 6,000 redundancies for our hotel and restaurant colleagues.
"We expect a significant proportion of these redundancies to be achieved voluntarily.
"Our priority now is to ensure that the process is fair and that impacted colleagues are supported throughout.
"This is a regrettable but necessary step to ensure that we emerge from the crisis with a lower cost base, a more flexible operating model and a stronger more resilient business."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article