Actor Noel Clarke’s High Court libel claim against The Guardian newspaper’s publisher is set to go to trial early next year, the court has been told.
Mr Clarke is suing Guardian News and Media (GNM) over eight articles accusing him of sexual misconduct, including one from April 2021 which said 20 women who knew Mr Clarke in a professional capacity had come forward with the allegations.
The former Doctor Who actor is bringing a libel and data protection claim against the publisher, claiming in a statement at the time that he “vehemently” denied “any sexual misconduct or criminal wrongdoing”.
He is seeking £10 million in special damages, with his barrister, Adam Speker KC, stating in written submissions for a preliminary hearing on Thursday that the trial could go ahead as early as January 2025.
Gavin Millar KC, for GNM, said in written submissions that the case “is perhaps the most substantial piece of libel litigation to come before the court in recent years”.
A further hearing will take place at a later date.
The court has previously heard that police decided no criminal investigation would be launched over the sexual offence allegations against Mr Clarke.
Scotland Yard said in a statement in March 2022 that there had been a thorough assessment by specialist detectives, but it was determined the information would not meet the threshold for a criminal investigation.
Mr Clarke may face the women who have accused him of sexual misconduct if they give oral evidence at trial, with barristers for GNM telling an earlier hearing that the publisher wished to rely on evidence of the women’s “mistreatment at the hands of the claimant” to “vindicate its journalism”.
In a judgment last year, Mr Justice Johnson said that seven of the articles “mean that there are strong grounds to believe that the claimant is guilty of various forms of sexual harassment” with the eighth meaning “grounds to investigate”.
The judge also ruled all of the articles could be defamatory, which had not been disputed by GNM over seven of the pieces.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article