The convener of the Scottish Parliament’s standards committee used his casting vote to recommend ex-minister Michael Matheson is banned from Holyrood for 27 days.
Martin Whitfield, the head of the Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee, backed a proposal from Conservative MSP Annie Wells to suspend Mr Matheson for almost one month after he racked up a near-£11,000 data roaming bill on his parliamentary iPad during a family holiday in Morocco.
He later revealed the costs had been incurred because his teenage sons were using the device as a wifi hotspot to watch football.
Initially, Mr Matheson had attempted to use a combination of his office costs and expenses to cover the bill, but he later said he would pay it himself after the issue was made public.
SNP committee members Jackie Dunbar and Alasdair Allan voted against the sanction.
Mr Matheson will also lose his salary for 54 days if the recommendations are approved by MSPs in a vote.
Mr Whitfield said: “A proposal for a period of exclusion of 27 sitting days was made by Annie Wells. (Tory MSP) Oliver Mundell indicated his support for this proposal.
“Jackie Dunbar and Alasdair Allan did not agree with this proposal. I did not cast my personal view in favour of the option but, in my capacity as convener, recognising that the committee would otherwise not have been in a position to make a recommendation, I supported the proposal for exclusion of a period of 27 sitting days.
“A majority of the committee therefore supported a recommendation of exclusion for a period of 27 sitting days.”
He said the sanction would have been worse but for “mitigatory factors, including the impact on the member and his family”.
Mr Allan said he thought the 27-day sanction was “extremely high” compared to previous cases, though he recognised the need for a penalty.
Ms Dunbar said she concurred with him.
Mr Mundell said there had been “significant damage” to the reputation of the Parliament and he would have backed a longer suspension – though he recognised the need for a majority view.
“Many in the real world would have faced the very real possibility of losing their job in the same circumstances”, he said.
Mr Whitfield said during the committee hearing on Thursday the entirety of the £10,941.74 bill had been paid.
“Mr Matheson has set out that since becoming aware of the circumstances in which the data usage occurred, he has been motivated by seeking to protect his family,” the convener added.
“Mr Matheson has described the significant impact that there has been on his family.
“The committee acknowledges the impact of the significant media and other intrusions which took place on Mr Matheson and his family.
“However, the obligations all members have under the code, the expenses scheme and relevant SPCB policies are of paramount importance in upholding the integrity of the scheme and the ethical standards framework, flowing from the Nolan Principles, that underpin the conduct of parliamentary duties.
“Any failure to meet those obligations has an adverse impact on the reputation of the expenses scheme, members and the Parliament as a whole.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here