Three out of five people want a UK-wide deposit return scheme (DRS) to be set up, while less than a quarter favour different initiatives being established in the four nations of the UK.
A poll found that across the UK, 75% of people back the introduction of DRS, with only 6% opposed to the measure.
The Scottish Government had to abandon plans to set up its own DRS last year after a row with Westminster over whether glass bottles could be included, but only 24% of people backed the idea of individual schemes running in England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland.
Polling by the Diflley Partnership, carried out for Tomra Collection, which manufactures reverse vending machines used in such schemes, found 60% of people want a single DRS running across all of the UK.
It had been hoped a DRS – which sees shoppers charged a small deposit when buying drinks in cans and bottles, with this cash then returned when they bring the empty container back for recycling – would be up and running by October 2025.
However the UK Government announced in April that a “revised timeline” has now been agreed which will see a DRS operational by October 2027.
The polling found 90% of people would use a DRS – with 45% saying they would do so all the time and 45% saying they would use it “sometimes”.
That came as 85% of people said litter is a problem in their area, while 81% of those questioned said they have made changes to their lifestyle in response to climate change.
John Lee, Tomra vice-president for public affairs in the UK and Ireland, said: “Public opinion and environmental concerns strongly support the deposit return scheme, signalling a widespread demand for action.
“As we face issues like litter, climate change and sustainability, it’s obvious that we need significant changes now.”
Mhairi McFarlane, research manager at the Diffley Partnership, which questioned 2,042 people between March 26 and April 2 for the study, said: “It is clear that environmental concerns are on the public’s minds, with more than two-thirds reporting they are worried about the impact of climate change, and that the vast majority view litter as a problem across the UK.
“In that context, it is perhaps unsurprising that three-quarters of people support a deposit return scheme and 90% would use such a scheme at least sometimes.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel