The prison system is “creaking at every level”, a watchdog warned as ministers prepared to release some offenders from their sentences up to 70 days early to ease overcrowding.
The early release scheme will be extended from 35 days to 70 days from May 23, according to an email to prison and probation staff obtained by The Times.
The email setting out the extension of the release scheme said that despite measures introduced less than two months ago to free up space, prisons face “significant challenges” and “pressures continue in the male estate” in England and Wales, according to the newspaper.
Chief inspector of prisons Charlie Taylor said “there simply isn’t enough space” despite “frantic” attempts to increase capacity with temporary accommodation and two new jails.
“The number of places simply can’t keep pace with the number of people coming in,” he told Times Radio.
“What we’re seeing at the moment is an estate that is creaking at every level under enormous pressure from the sheer churn and numbers of people within the system.”
He said prisoners needed support “to begin to be rehabilitated” but “if they are simply left languishing in a cell, exposed to all kinds of drugs, further criminality, then the danger is actually they come out worse than they went in”.
That would result in “more victims of crime, more violence, more communities in mayhem”.
Mr Taylor said 24,000 more places were required by 2028 “and that just simply isn’t realistic in terms of building”.
“So ultimately there needs to be a conversation about who we lock up, what we want people to do when they are locked up and how long we lock people up for.”
Justice Secretary Alex Chalk announced in October that the Government would use the powers it has to allow the Prison Service to let some prisoners out of jail up to 18 days early to ease overcrowding.
In March, he extended the so-called end of custody supervised licence scheme “to around 35-60 days”, as Ministry of Justice (MoJ) statistics showed that prisons in England and Wales were still nearing capacity.
The Government insisted the measure would be temporary and only apply to “low-level offenders”.
Ministers reportedly quietly authorised the latest change without any formal announcement.
During an urgent question in the Commons, Labour’s shadow justice secretary Shabana Mahmood said the Government was making the changes “in secret”.
She said: “This is the price that the public is paying for a justice system in crisis and a Government in freefall.”
She added: “The Government is releasing prisoners, but not the facts. The strategy is clear for all to see, say nothing, try and get away with it and get to the other side of the general election. It’s shameless, and frankly a disgrace.”
Justice minister Edward Argar replied: “I think (Ms Mahmood) suggesting ‘sneaking it out’, in October and March, which included statements to this House was entirely transparent.”
Mr Chalk was previously criticised for making the March announcement via a written ministerial statement to Parliament after 8pm, before attending the Commons in person the following day to update MPs.
The MoJ insisted that offenders freed early were under strict supervision.
A MoJ spokesperson said: “We will always ensure there is enough capacity to keep dangerous offenders behind bars.
“We are carrying out the biggest prison expansion programme in a hundred years, opening up 20,000 modern places, and ramping up work to remove foreign national offenders.
“To ease the short-term pressures on prisons, in March we announced an increase in the number of days governors could, under existing powers, move some offenders at the end of their prison term on to licence.
“These offenders will continue to be supervised under strict conditions such as tagging and curfews.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel