A watchdog has called for legal powers so inspectors can order failing police forces to improve when there are serious concerns for public safety.
Chief inspector of constabulary Andy Cooke said public trust in the police was “hanging by a thread” in the wake of a series of “dreadful” scandals and systemic failings.
Describing the police service as being at a “historic turning point”, he stressed the need for “definitive action” so standards improve instead of “glossy strategies and mission statements” that do not bring about lasting change.
Arguing his case for the sweeping reforms, Mr Cooke said this would allow more scrutiny over vetting and recruitment as he urged Home Secretary Suella Braverman to given serious consideration to the proposals and bring forward draft legislation.
The wide-ranging powers would mean the watchdog could tell police to make changes when serious public safety concerns were identified and forces would be legally required to comply. At present, inspectors have a legal power to enter police stations and demand documents but no powers to enforce recommendations made.
The changes, if introduced, could also see the watchdog re-instated as having a role in selecting and appointing chief constables.
Setting out his first annual assessment of policing in England and Wales since he was appointed to the role, Mr Cooke said: “Through the withdrawal from neighbourhood policing and the dysfunctionality of the criminal justice system, some critical elements – the police’s governance, leadership and workforce arrangements – need substantial reform.
“Included in that reform should be additional powers for the inspectors of constabulary so we can make changes happen when they’re needed.
“Too often we’ve seen forces failing to act, or not acting quickly enough, to address our recommendations. This includes a power for me as chief inspector to give directions to a police force where there are serious public safety concerns.”
Mr Cooke highlighted examples of the watchdog repeatedly raising concerns since 2016 on vetting and the abuse of power by police officers for sexual purpose but seeing little improvement in standards.
He told reporters: “And in those seven years, we had some truly horrendous acts by police officers. Now I’m not sitting here saying that wouldn’t have happened if they would have done our recommendations earlier.
“But surely the question’s got to be asked if I could direct around those issues, as opposed to recommending, a lot more would have been done a lot quicker.”
Mr Cooke would not confirm if he had already met with Government ministers to discuss the plans, but added that he “will be having conversations” in future.
Asked what sanctions forces could face if they still failed to comply under the plans, he said it would be for Parliament to decide but referred to powers of police and crime commissioners to dismiss chief constables.
Mr Cooke, who before his appointment served as a police officers for 36 years, insisted policing was not “broken beyond repair” but that the service had a “limited window of opportunity” to rebuilt public trust.
Police were still “missing the basics” on too many occasions and need to be more efficient. Forces were facing “rising demand from the public and, quite simply, they aren’t always keeping up”.
He told how police had lost “discipline” and said professionalism – including the importance of wearing a smart uniform – needs to be drummed into recruits and upheld by bosses.
At best, people are left dissatisfied and at worst left at risk, he said, adding: “Victims are increasingly less satisfied with the way they are treated by the police and the criminal justice system.”
But the problems faced by forces are not helped by a funding system which is “not fit for purpose” and a “dysfunctional and defective” criminal justice system, he added.
Although Mr Cooke defended stop and search as an “essential tool in preventing and detecting crime”, he said police need to better understand how to use it “effectively and fairly” as he called for more detailed research into the deterrent effect of stop and search and the causes of disproportionality in its use.
He also said it was not the job of officers to “champion social change” or “take sides” on social issues, adding: “The police are there to uphold the law. And it’s not for individual police chiefs to decide which causes they support or not.”
Meanwhile Mr Cooke expressed concern amid reports corrupt officers were switching to using Telegram and auto-deleting messages, instead of Whatsapp, to avoid being caught.
“Policing needs to redouble its efforts to identify those people who totally besmirch the proud reputation that British policing has.
“We will never totally eradicate every corrupt officer but the police service needs to be doing all it can to ensure that these individuals are identified as soon as possible,” he said.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article