The GMB has withdrawn its bid for union recognition at Amazon after accusing the online giant of “dirty tricks”.
The GMB said it had increased the number of its members to 800 at the company’s Coventry warehouse after a series of strikes were held in a dispute over pay.
This meant union membership was more than half the total workforce, a figure needed for statutory recognition, said the union.
The GMB claimed that once it made an official application to the Central Arbitration Committee (CAC), Amazon said it had 2,700 workers at the site.
Union members working at the Coventry site claim the warehouse has been “flooded” with up to 1,000 new starters since the strike action began.
Amazon said it regularly recruits new staff and this year had been no different.
Further strikes will take place on June 12, 13 and 14.
Stuart Richards, GMB senior organiser said: “Earlier this year, in one of the busiest periods for retail, Amazon told people there were around 1,400 workers in Coventry.
“After GMB submitted a request for recognition, Amazon went on a massive recruitment drive.
“They now claim to have more than 2,700 workers at the site.
“GMB believes this was purely in response to GMB membership growing so close to the threshold for statutory union recognition.
“Amazon has refused to pay workers a decent wage, but are now paying an additional 1,300 workers to try and bust the union.
“We estimate that’s more than £300,000 a week, just to stop workers having a voice in their workplace.
“This is more than it would cost to pay the original workforce the £15 an hour they were asking for.
“It’s dirty tricks, plain and simple.”
An Amazon spokesperson said: “We respect our employees’ rights to join, or not to join, a union.
“We offer competitive pay, comprehensive benefits, opportunities for career growth, all while working in a safe, modern, work environment.
“At Amazon, these benefits and opportunities come with the job, as does the ability to communicate directly with the leadership of the company.
“We regularly recruit new team members, across the country and across the year, providing great new career opportunities for thousands of people and to meet customer demand.
“This year is no different.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here