Ukraine could add old Leopard 1 battle tanks from German defence industry stocks to deliveries of modern tanks that Berlin and other governments pledged last week to counter Russian forces in the war.
German government spokesman Steffen Hebestreit confirmed on Friday that “export authorisation has been granted” but declined to give numbers or other details, saying they may become more concrete “in the coming days and weeks”.
He told reporters in Berlin the application from industry to permit delivery of Leopard 1 tanks was made “some time” ago.
Mr Hebestreit’s comments came after the daily newspaper Sueddeutsche Zeitung said the government had cleared the export of the tanks and they could be sent as soon as the defence industry gets them in working order.
It said two companies, Rheinmetall and FFG, want to prepare dozens of Leopard 1 tanks which could be delivered to Ukraine if it is interested.
But it also said there are issues so far with securing sufficient ammunition for the vehicles.
It was not immediately clear when any deliveries might be possible – but it appeared unlikely to be a quick process.
The Leopard 1, made between the mid-1960s and the mid-1980s, was the first battle tank built for West Germany’s Bundeswehr.
The German military has not had any of the tanks since 2003, Defence Ministry spokesman Arne Collatz said.
Germany last week agreed to send 14 modern Leopard 2 A6 tanks from its military’s current stocks.
Several other European countries have equipped their armies with Leopard 2 tanks and Germany’s move — which followed weeks of mounting pressure to supply battle tanks — meant they also can give some of their stocks to Ukraine.
The United States said it will send 31 M1 Abrams tanks, while UK Prime Minister Rishi Sunak has pledged to send around 14 Challenger 2s.
Ukraine’s ambassador to Germany, Oleksii Makeiev, welcomed Friday’s announcement from Berlin.
“After the historic decision last week on the Leopard 2, it is an important signal that the tank coalition has not just been formed by the western partners but is increasing and becoming stronger,” he told German news agency dpa.
He said “we have no time to lose.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel