Evidence of what could be one of the first skirmishes of the English Civil War in the 17th century has been uncovered by HS2 archaeologists.
Around 200 impact marks from pistol shots were discovered on a heavily fortified medieval gatehouse of Coleshill Manor in Warwickshire.
More than 40 musket balls were also found in nearby soil, further suggesting a confrontation took place.
The first recorded battle of the Civil War was the Battle of Curdworth Bridge in 1642, a short distance from Coleshill Manor.
Professor Alice Roberts, historian and presenter of BBC show Digging For Britain, which will feature HS2’s archaeology work, said: “The discovery of the medieval gatehouse at Coleshill was quite unexpected and I was amazed at just how much of the monumental stone building – with its two great octagonal towers – had survived below the ground.
“The front of the gatehouse was pockmarked and had clearly been shot at with muskets – perhaps for target practice – but there’s also an intriguing possibility that we’re looking at evidence of the earliest skirmish of the Civil War.”
Stuart Pierson, archaeologist at Wessex Archaeology, commissioned to carry out the excavations for HS2, described the discoveries as “extraordinary”.
He went on: “These findings – not recorded in historical records – would have been lost to time had it not been for the expertise and hard work of the team.”
Coleshill Manor, next to a bridge over the River Cole, was in the hands of Royalist Simon Digby as the Civil War approached.
It would have been a strategic position that the Parliamentarians would have wanted to control, and experts believe they would have passed close to it on their way to Curdworth Bridge.
Records of the Civil War are confined to major battles, so many details of events are unknown.
More than 100 archaeological sites have been examined on the route of phase one of HS2’s high-speed railway which is being constructed between London and Birmingham.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel