Former world champion boxer David Haye grabbed a man by the throat and threatened to kill him because he believed he was making “derogatory remarks” about him and his partner, a court heard.
The 41-year-old, who won a heavyweight world title in 2009, is accused of assaulting a man, Nickesh Jhala, at the Hammersmith Apollo on October 30 last year.
Haye appeared at Westminster Magistrates’ Court on Tuesday wearing a white shirt and a navy blazer.
Jonathan Bryan, prosecuting, told the court that the alleged assault occurred during the interval at Paul Chowdry’s comedy gig at the venue.
Mr Jhala, his girlfriend, and his cousin were sitting behind Haye and his girlfriend.
“It seems that Mr Haye believed that some of the people sitting behind him were saying derogatory remarks about him and his partner,” Mr Bryan said.
“We say Mr Haye put his hands around Mr Jhala’s throat and threatened him, saying things to the effect that if Mr Jhala said anything more, he would kill him,” Mr Bryan added.
He told the court that Mr Jhala was not hurt by the incident, but he was left “shaken”.
The prosecutor added: “The security were aware of what happened, but nothing was done about it.”
James Scobie KC, defending, said that his client’s case was that he never put his hands around Mr Jhala’s throat, and he did not threaten to kill him.
“Our unequivocal case is ‘hand on shoulder’, at most, and no threats to kill, ever,” he said.
Mr Jhala gave evidence to the court.
He said he attended the venue with his cousin and his girlfriend.
Originally his group were sitting at the back, but they were then given seats near the front of the venue by staff during the interval.
Mr Jhala told the court that he did not talk about Haye, but instead talked about how glad he and his friends were to get better seats.
CCTV footage of the incident shows Haye stepping over his seat and bending over to talk to Mr Jhala.
“He leans down to me, starts speaking into my ear, and puts his hands around my throat,” Mr Jhala said.
He told the court that Haye told him: “’Say one more word and I am going to kill you.'”
The witness added: “I felt threatened, I was shaking.”
Mr Jhala said he told Haye he had not said anything.
“I said: ‘I did not even say anything, what are you talking about?’” he said.
Mr Scobie told the court that the incident occurred after Mr Jhala’s cousin, a boxing fan, had asked Haye for an autograph, but was denied.
He said that Mr Jhala and his cousin then began to talk about Haye’s career, mentioning other boxers Amir Khan and Tony Bellew, and referring to Haye injuring his toe during a fight.
Mr Scobie added that this conversation was an effort to get a “rise” out of Haye.
“Poking him up, trying to get a rise out of him,” he said.
He said that this was because Mr Jhala’s cousin had felt “disrespected” by Haye.
Mr Jhala denied that his cousin mentioned Tony Bellew before the incident occurred, but admitted that his cousin brought up Bellew afterwards.
Haye fought Tony Bellew twice in his professional career, losing both times in 2017 and 2018.
Mr Scobie told the court that Mr Jhala said of Haye’s girlfriend “she must be with him” before his cousin replied “we have no chance”.
He added that Mr Jhala told his cousin that Haye’s girlfriend “must love the brothers”, referring to black men.
“You said, clearly, ‘she must love the brothers’.”
It is after this alleged remark that Mr Scobie said that Haye then approached Mr Jhala.
“He puts his left hand on your right shoulder,” Mr Scobie said.
He said that Haye then told Mr Jhala: “’Don’t talk about me or my girlfriend any more, that’s enough.’
“’Otherwise I will have you thrown out.’”
Mr Jhala denied this version of events.
Mr Scobie said that Haye then brushed Mr Jhala’s hair before sitting down.
Haye became a professional boxer at the age of 22 and went on to become a cruiserweight world champion in 2008, winning three of the four major world titles in addition to the Ring Magazine and Lineal titles.
The trial continues.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article