Conservative MP Lee Anderson has reached a settlement after complaining that a Google Ads advert suggested he was “sympathetic to the abuse of children”.
Google Ireland Ltd issued an apology to Mr Anderson, who represents Ashfield in Nottinghamshire, at a High Court hearing in London on Thursday.
A barrister representing Mr Anderson told Judge Jaron Lewis that the advert, displayed on a website in February 2021, suggested he was “protective of or sympathetic to the abuse of children and those who perpetrate such abuse”.
Felicity McMahon said Mr Anderson had settled a “threatened action” for defamation and breach of data protection law and rights with Google Ireland.
Barrister Hope Williams, who represented Google Ireland, said the company “sincerely” apologised to Mr Anderson for any distress the advert had caused him.
Ms Williams told the judge that the advert should not have been displayed as it did not comply with Google Ads policies.
She added that the advert was removed as soon as Mr Anderson alerted Google Ireland to it.
Ms McMahon said Mr Anderson had been informed, 13 months ago, that a Google Ads advert was being displayed on the Guido Fawkes website – a “popular political news source” which attracts hundreds of thousands of regular readers.
She said the advert linked to a “fringe campaign group” called “Keeping Kids Safe” and featured a picture of Mr Anderson next to the headline “MP Office protect paedophile”.
“The claimant and his family were extremely distressed by the advert, which falsely suggested he was protective of or sympathetic to the abuse of children, and those who perpetrate such abuse,” she said.
“This was highly defamatory, threatening to erode the confidence of the claimant’s constituents in him as their elected representative.”
Ms Williams told the judge: “The defendant is here today through me to sincerely apologise to the claimant for any distress the advert has caused to him and his family, and for any loss of confidence his constituents have suffered in the Member of Parliament as a result of seeing the advert.
“The advert should not have been displayed as it did not comply with the Google Ads policies.
“The defendant removed the advert as soon as the claimant alerted it to it.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article