Conservationists have renewed calls for a total ban on burning carbon-rich peatland, as moorland fires are set in the run-up to Cop26 climate talks.
More than 100 fires were reported on upland moors in Northern England, largely in national parks, in the past few days by campaign group Wild Moors and Greenpeace’s investigative journalism team, Unearthed.
The RSPB has also raised concerns over potential illegal peat burning, and said it was “outrageous” the fires were going ahead in the run-up to the Cop26 climate talks taking place at the end of the month in Glasgow.
Grouse moor managers carry out controlled burning of heather on peatland during winter months to stimulate new growth of the plants which red grouse can feed on, and say their methods do not harm the peat below.
But conservationists say burning peatland destroys vegetation, erodes the carbon-storing peat and reduces its ability to slow the flow of water and prevent flooding in the valleys below.
In England, the Environment Department (Defra) has brought in a ban on burning on blanket bog with deep peat, more than 40cm in depth, in specially protected areas, without a licence.
The Government said there was consensus that burning of vegetation on blanket bog was damaging to peatland formation and the condition of the habitat, and made it more difficult or impossible to restore them to their natural state.
But environmental groups say the ban covers less than a third of upland peat and has loopholes that could allow burning to still go ahead there.
They have called on the Government to widen the prohibition on burning to cover all upland peatland in England.
Luke Steele, executive director of Wild Moors, said there had been a surge in burning this year and said: “It’s illogical to keep this outdated, intensive and environmentally-destructive practice afloat for the sake of a cohort of unscrupulous grouse moors who can’t break their burning habit.”
Kate Blagojevic, Greenpeace UK’s head of climate, said: “Just days before the UK is due to host a major climate summit, our largest terrestrial carbon store is on fire.”
She called for a comprehensive and immediate ban, adding: “There are better ways to welcome world leaders to a crucial climate summit than the sight of smoke and flames engulfing our largest carbon store.”
Amanda Anderson, director of the Moorland Association, defended the practice of heather burning, which is permitted between October and April on shallow peat and “in very exceptional circumstances” on deeper peat, as a legal and regulated land management tool.
She said there was no evidence that any legislation had been contravened, and added: “Burning is only undertaken in the right place, at the right time and for the right reason.
“Controlled burning does not damage peatland as the technique burns the heather but not the peat below it.”
She also said the vast majority of emissions from peat came from lowland peatlands and added: “Moor owners are committed to playing their part in tackling climate change and have already achieved significant gains towards climate change targets in terms of peatland restoration.”
But the RSPB’s senior policy officer, Dr Pat Thompson, said the practice needed to stop, warning: “Each burn on peatland destroys crucial vegetation and exposes the surface of the peat itself.
“This leads to erosion both as the carbon in the peat is released into the atmosphere or is carried off into our rivers, causing pollution.
“It’s outrageous that in the run-up to the UK hosting Cop26 in Glasgow we are watching our peatlands burn.
“These are the UK’s equivalent of the rainforests in terms of both their nature and their storage of carbon,” Dr Thompson added.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel