Mark Zuckerberg has dismissed attacks on Facebook as “misrepresenting” the work the company does after a whistleblower told the US Congress the site harms children’s mental health and fuels polarisation.
Sharing a memo he sent to staff on his personal Facebook page, the social network’s founder said the company “cares deeply about issues like safety, well-being and mental health”.
It came in response to Frances Haugen, a former Facebook data scientist turned whistleblower, who told the US Senate Commerce Subcommittee on Consumer Protection on Tuesday that Facebook refuses to change its products because executives elevate profits over safety.
Ms Haugen accused the tech giant of being aware of the apparent harm Instagram could have on some teenagers and their body image, and said the firm had been dishonest in its public fight against hate content and misinformation by hiding research that shows it amplifies such content.
She has come forward with thousands of pages of internal research documents she secretly copied before leaving her job in the company’s civic integrity unit.
Mr Zuckerberg hit back, saying Ms Haugen’s testimony and the recent coverage of the company linked to it “just doesn’t reflect the company we know” and it was “difficult to see coverage that misrepresents our work and our motives”.
“At the most basic level, I think most of us just don’t recognise the false picture of the company that is being painted,” he said.
“At the heart of these accusations is this idea that we prioritise profit over safety and well-being. That’s just not true.
“For example, one move that has been called into question is when we introduced the Meaningful Social Interactions change to News Feed.
“This change showed fewer viral videos and more content from friends and family – which we did knowing it would mean people spent less time on Facebook, but that research suggested it was the right thing for people’s well-being. Is that something a company focused on profits over people would do?”
Mr Zuckerberg also accused Facebook’s critics of scaring other companies out of doing research on their global impact.
“We have an industry-leading research programme so that we can identify important issues and work on them. It’s disheartening to see that work taken out of context and used to construct a false narrative that we don’t care,” he said.
“If we attack organisations making an effort to study their impact on the world, we’re effectively sending the message that it’s safer not to look at all, in case you find something that could be held against you.”
In what has been a difficult week for the social network, Mr Zuckerberg also commented on the major outage which hit the company on Monday, taking Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp offline for more than five hours.
He described it as “the worst outage we’ve had in years” and said staff had “spent the past 24 hours debriefing how we can strengthen our systems against this kind of failure”, but did not offer an further insight into what had caused the issue.
Facebook had said the incident was caused by a “faulty configuration change” within its network infrastructure.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here