India has criticised the British decision not to recognise coronavirus vaccine certificates issued by Indian authorities, calling it a “discriminatory policy”.
Foreign Secretary Harsh Vardhan Shringla said the new rules unveiled last week, which take effect next month, could force India to “impose reciprocal measures” if it isn’t resolved.
The new rules require Indians visiting the UK to quarantine for 10 days and undergo Covid-19 tests even if they are fully vaccinated with Indian-made AstraZeneca vaccine.
The vaccine, produced under licence by India’s Serum Institute, the world’s largest vaccine maker, is not recognised by the UK. The institute has not formally applied to the European Union for official approval of its AstraZeneca vaccine, which it calls Covishield.
“Here is a vaccine, Covishield, which is a licenced product of a UK company, manufactured in India, of which we have supplied 5 million doses to the UK at the request of the Government of the UK. We understand that this has been used in the national health system and therefore, non-recognition of Covishield is a discriminatory policy,” Shringla told reporters.
India’s foreign minister, Subrahmanyam Jaishankar, said he discussed the matter with Foreign Secretary Liz Truss on the sidelines of the UN General Assembly.
In a tweet, Jaishankar said he urged Truss to quickly resolve the issue.
The new rules, which also require people arriving from many other countries to undergo quarantine, have sparked anger in India.
On Monday, a leader of the main opposition Congress party, Shashi Tharoor, said he has cancelled a book tour of Britain in protest and accused the UK Government of “double standards”.
Another lawmaker, Jairam Ramesh, said the decision “smacks of racism”.
The vast majority of Indians have been vaccinated with the Indian-made AstraZeneca vaccine. Others have received Covaxin, which is not used in Britain.
India, the world’s largest vaccine producer, has said it will resume exports and donations of surplus coronavirus vaccines in October after a months-long freeze because of massive surge in domestic infections.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here