Liverpool will continue to plan for a “positive future” despite a decision to delete it from the World Heritage List, leaders have vowed.
On Wednesday, members of the United Nations Education Scientific and Cultural Organisation (Unesco) World Heritage Committee voted in a secret ballot to strip the city of its status after fears developments, including the new Everton FC stadium, posed a threat to its value.
The city’s waterfront was named a World Heritage Site in 2004 but has been on the List of World Heritage in Danger since 2012, when the committee decided the Liverpool Waters development, planned for the city’s northern docks, was a potential threat to the site.
Liverpool mayor Joanne Anderson described the decision as “incomprehensible”.
She said: “We will be working with Government to examine whether we can appeal but, whatever happens, Liverpool will always be a World Heritage city.
“We have a stunning waterfront and incredible built heritage that is the envy of other cities.
“Our commitment to maintaining and improving our buildings remains as strong as ever and will continue to be a key part of our drive to attract visitors, along with leisure, retail and events.
“I find it incomprehensible that Unesco would rather Bramley Moore Dock remain a derelict wasteland, rather than making a positive contribution to the city’s future and that of its residents.
“I’ll now be seeking to draw together all the UK heritage bodies in a round table to plan a positive future with further investment.”
Metro mayor of Liverpool City Region Steve Rotheram said: “This is a really disappointing decision, but I am confident that our city will remain a vibrant and attractive cultural destination and – as we rebuild from the pandemic – will continue to welcome millions of people to our city and wider city region.”
A spokeswoman for Historic England said it believed the area was in a better condition now then when it was first awarded the status thanks to regeneration projects.
She said: “We acknowledge the challenges the city faces, but believe that Liverpool’s heritage remains internationally important.
“Despite Unesco’s decision, we are committed to supporting Liverpudlians and the council to champion their city’s extraordinary heritage now and in the future.”
Liverpool Chamber of Commerce chief executive Paul Cherpeau said the decision was “a shame” but the city had huge potential for growth.
He said: “In this wider context, the loss of World Heritage Status is a glancing blow, yet Liverpool remains steady in its pursuit of economic prosperity for the people who live and work here through the creation of jobs and opportunities to broaden our economic base.”
Campaign group Save Britain’s Heritage said the move was an “embarrassment” for the Government.
Executive president Marcus Binney said: “We lament the failure of British ministers to speak out strongly to emphasise the welcome change of direction in Liverpool in favour of reviving historic buildings and areas.
“Despite the losses, the Albert Dock, St George’s Hall and Ropewalks are outstanding examples of urban revival and preservation enterprise at a global scale.
“This disaster of striking off Liverpool should never have been allowed to happen.”
A Government spokeswoman said: “We are extremely disappointed in this decision and believe Liverpool still deserves its World Heritage Status given the significant role the historic docks and the wider city have played throughout history.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel