ANGELA Rayner squirmed as she was confronted with her past tweets attacking the Tories for planning to hit pensioner benefits – while she tried to defend Labour taking money from the elderly.
The Deputy Prime Minister was challenged over comments she had made in 2017, criticising the then-prime minister Theresa May for raids on pensioners which never came to pass.
In the run-up to that year’s General Election, the Tories proposed making the Winter Fuel Payment a means-tested benefit, a policy which Labour have taken up since coming to power earlier this year.
In 2017, the-then shadow chancellor John McDonnell (below), now suspended from the Labour Party, said the move risked killing around 4000 pensioners.
During an appearance on BBC Breakfast on Thursday morning, Rayner was read her tweets criticising the policy, which has now been adopted by Labour.
Defending her shifting stance, Rayner said: “Well between 2017 and that comment, and me challenging Theresa May and us getting into Government, was Liz Truss, and of course Rishi Sunak as chancellor, who crashed the economy, sent interest rates up to nearly 11%, which affects pensioners directly and left us with a £22 billion black hole.
READ MORE: Unearthed Rachel Reeves clips undermines her own Winter Fuel Payment claim
“We have to make sure that we can fiscally be responsible so that we can grow our economy so that we can pay for our public services and we said that in the run-up to the General Election.”
Angela Rayner is confronted with her words in 2017, when (in relation to the winter fuel allowance) she defended the principle of universalism.
— Saul Staniforth (@SaulStaniforth) September 5, 2024
Rayner explains that because Truss crashed the economy she has had to change her principles. pic.twitter.com/3zH8C1V2cI
She said Labour had been forced to “make difficult decisions” but insisted that in the run-up to the election, the party had been “very clear” it would not “play fast and loose with the country’s finances because that’s what the Tories did and that’s why we’re in this mess in the first place”.
BBC Breakfast host Naga Munchetty (above) shot back: “In the meantime, and it’s a phrase you’ve heard before, there will be people choosing between heating and eating.
“While you deal with the public finances and the finances you’ve been left, as you say by the Conservative Government, how long will pensioners who are going without the Winter Fuel Payment need to choose between heating and eating?”
READ MORE: Rachel Reeves slammed for 'staggering hypocrisy' on austerity as old clip resurfaces
Rayner insisted Labour had “protected the most vulnerable pensioners” by ensuring the worst-off pensioners, mainly those claiming Pension Credit, were still entitled to the benefit and said the Government was seeking to boost the number of people claiming Pension Credit.
She added: “We’ve extended the household support fund, which is over £400m, through local authorities that can support pensioners who need it, who may struggle this winter and we’ve also made sure that we protected the triple-lock.
“Pensioners will know that when you lose control of the economy and interest rates go up to the levels we saw under the previous Government, that hits them the hardest.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel