A SCOTTISH Tory MSP has claimed his party could make gains in Scotland.
Speaking to journalists at the Perth election count on Thursday, Murdo Fraser said the exit poll was in “two parts”, with voters south of the Border “looking for a change”, while those in Scotland were voting against the SNP.
The joint poll, which came with major caveats for its Scottish predictions, suggested the Tories would drop to 131 seats, with Labour on course for a landslide with a 170-seat majority.
The SNP, however, were forecast to drop to just 10 seats – dropping from 48 in the 2019 election.
READ MORE: Why exit poll is not the worst-case scenario for independence supporters
“The exit poll clearly is in two parts, you’ve got the situation south of the Border which very much is in line with polling, what we expected,” said Fraser (below).
“Clearly people are casting a verdict on 14 years of Conservative government, five prime ministers, and the country was looking for a change.
“The situation in Scotland, clearly, is a very different one because it looks like people are actually making up their minds how to vote based primarily on a verdict on 17 years of the SNP in government and clearly have not liked what they have seen from the SNP and they’re up for an even bigger change, potentially, in Scotland.
READ MORE: John Curtice issues exit poll 'health warning' over SNP and Reform predictions
“It does look like, on the basis of the exit poll, the Conservatives might not just be looking to hold the seats we have in Scotland but actually might make gains.”
While it appears that the exit poll's central prediction of a Labour landslide will bear out in reality, its Scottish projections have been questioned.
It appears the SNP would need to lose six seats to the Conservatives, putting Rishi Sunak's party on 12 MPs north of the Border.
This includes wins in Stephen Flynn's (above) Aberdeen South and SNP-held seats like Perth and Stirling.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here