THE UK’s top civil servant has apologised for his “raw, in-the-moment” WhatsApp messages about Boris Johnson and Downing Street colleagues at the UK Covid-19 Inquiry.
Simon Case sent messages saying former PM Johnson “cannot lead” and calling officials “basically feral” at the height of the pandemic.
At the time, Case was the prime minister’s chief adviser and told the UK’s Covid-19 Inquiry he “deeply regretted” the messages.
READ MORE: Tories 'prejudiced' probe into Michael Matheson, John Swinney says
Case was previously absent from other hearings when senior Westminster figures gave evidence due to medical leave.
In WhatsApp messages shown to the inquiry, Case said the following:
- Johnson “cannot lead” and “changes strategic direction every day”
- The then-PM and “the people he chooses to surround himself with are basically feral”
- “I’ve never seen a bunch of people less well-equipped to run a country” in a message to Mark Sedwill, the civil service chief at the time
- He found it “hilarious” that people travelling had to isolate in quarantine hotels and had “no sympathy” for airlines going bankrupt
- Referred to Johnson as a “distrusted figure,” expressing concerns the public wouldn’t follow isolation rules under his leadership
Case told the inquiry: “They are very raw, in-the-moment human expressions – they’re not the whole story but I recognise they’re part of the story.
“Many of them now require apologies for things that I said and the way I expressed myself.
“Those are examples that I obviously now deeply regret of expressing my in-the-moment frustrations with the former prime minister.”
He further admitted that his WhatsApp message “crisis + pygmies = toxic behaviour” was likely a comment on the abilities of people in the Cabinet Office and Number 10.
He added that civil servants were being “smashed to pieces” by poor working practices including duplication of effort and overlapping of meetings, he said.
“Good people were working incredibly hard in impossible circumstances with choices where it seems there was never a right answer,” he said.
“But that lack of sort of a team spirit, the difficult atmosphere, we were trying to run everything from the centre of government, trying to run the response to a global pandemic.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here