CREATIVE Scotland has not recovered all of the money paid out to the maker of an explicit sex project, MSPs have been told.
The arts funding body withdrew money for the explicit Rein project when its pitch for “simulated sex” became an intention to have real sex in the performance, its chief executive has said.
The arts funding body awarded £84,555 to director Leonie Rae Gasson for the project, withdrawing the money in March after a casting call led to the realisation that Rein was “considerably more explicit” than first thought.
However, it has only been able to recover about 90% of the money as some has already been paid to third party freelancers.
A total of £23,210 was also paid out for the “R&D phase” of the project in August 2022 which Creative Scotland is not seeking to recover.
READ MORE: Thousands of Robert Burns artefacts put online for first time
So far, the organisation has not released the original funding application submitted by the director.
Gasson disputes that the funding body was misled and the artists involved say they have been transparent throughout.
Following an outcry about the publicly-funded nature of the project and questions from MSPs, Creative Scotland chief executive Iain Munro (below) wrote to Holyrood’s Culture Committee.
He sought to explain Creative Scotland’s reasoning behind the funding award, saying the organisation should not be an arbiter of “cultural taste” and not everyone would agree with its decisions.
He said: “Rein was originally supported in the knowledge it would be a challenging, creatively ambitious piece of experimental performance art, with a clear storytelling narrative, strong sexual themes and simulated sexual performance, and would speak to a particular audience rather than the mainstream.”
Munro praised the “strong track record” of the applicant, saying the issues of queer culture and sexuality would be dealt with sensitively.
He continued: “However, as became clear in March 2024 when the project team developed new content for their website and publicised that as part of a call-out for participants, one new and significant difference emerged which took the project into unacceptable territory.
“That was the intention to include real sex, as opposed to performance depicting simulated sex, in the work.”
Creative Scotland took legal advice and withdrew the funding due to the change, he said, adding that the organisation is reviewing its handling of the application.
The organisation is also seeking legal advice around whether the application can be released, Munro said.
READ MORE: Channel 4 told to act on 'racist' Twitter posts from Rachel Riley
He condemned the “threats and abuse” which had been faced by people involved in the project.
“Legitimate costs” of £8,359 in payments to freelancers will not be recovered in order to protect their incomes, the letter said.
Earlier, Culture Committee convener Clare Adamson had noted “public concern” about Rein and suggested Munro may be called to appear before MSPs.
Opposition MSPs had called for all of the money to be clawed back and criticised Rein’s funding at a time when other cultural projects are struggling for cash.
In a statement sent to The Herald , those behind the Rein project said they disagreed with Creative Scotland’s version of events.
They said the project had been “misunderstood and misrepresented” and would have been “a new, immersive, three-screen, moving image, art installation fusing moving image, multi-sensory set design and dance in an erotic exploration of lesbian and queer sexuality set in the Scottish landscape”.
READ MORE: NC500: 'Disgraceful' littering and 'love lock' issues continue
They continued: “Everyone involved in the project is deeply saddened that the funding body did not seek clarification with the artists, or suggest working together to elucidate to third parties that the project is an artistic moving image film and not what has been widely reported or claimed.
“No opportunity was given to the artists to work towards a joint resolution or alternative outcome prior to the funding body’s decision to defund the work.
“The artists do not agree that they misled the funding body.
“The performer callout did use the new terminology of non-simulated as a shorthand for performers, however, the artists have been transparent about the nature of the work with the funding body throughout both R&D 1 (in 2022/23) and R&D 2 (in 2024).
“The artists will not be speaking with any media or press.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here