AN attempt by SNP councillors to take over the Unionist-run Argyll and Bute Council has succeeded - but it came down to a cut of the cards.
The council had been run by the The Argyll, Lomond and Islands Group (Talig), which is comprised of Tory, LibDem and independent councillors, for 11 years.
But a special full council meeting on Thursday, the vote for both provost and leader were tied 18-18, forcing a cut of the cards under the rules for such a scenario for a political appointment.
The highest card determined the successful candidates in both votes.
READ MORE: Scottish councillor 'ashamed' of council tax increase
Maurice Corry (Conservative, Lomond North), who had been provost at the start of the meeting, drew the two of diamonds. Councillor Douglas Philand (Independent, Mid Argyll) drew the eight of spades, making him the new provost.
For leader of the council, in alphabetical order Councillor Robin Currie (Liberal Democrat, Kintyre and the Islands) drew the six of spades.
Councillor Jim Lynch (SNP, Oban South and the Isles) drew the 10 of spades, making him the new leader.
READ MORE: Argyll and Bute set to hike council tax by 10 per cent despite freeze
Fifteen councillors, all members of the Strategic Opposition Partnership - 12 SNP, two independents and one Labour - called for the special meeting after a furious row over the council's vote in February in favour of a 10% increase in council tax.
They said they wanted to see a new provost and council leader appointed following the row, as they accused council leaders of choosing "to play petty politics" instead of engaging with the Scottish Government.
It's anticipated that that increase will be reversed at a further special meeting of the full council, due to take place on Monday, April 15.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel