PLANS for a Morrisons in a Scottish town have been refused over fears the site could flood and worries about “significant” traffic problems.
The national retailer had lodged a proposal for the store and petrol station on land in Banff.
But Aberdeenshire Council planners had recommended the plan be thrown out over worries the shop would be built on a floodplain.
They were also concerned that it would create traffic issues on the already busy A98 route.
READ MORE: Scotland could have 'cheapest electricity in Europe', Octopus Energy chief says
Members of the Banff and Buchan area committee considered the application on Tuesday morning – and unanimously agreed to reject the development.
Councillor Glen Reynolds said it had been a “long journey” for the proposal and noted it had taken many “twists and turns” along the way.
However, he made it clear the refusal was not against Morrisons but rather the location of the proposed store was simply the “wrong place”.
He said there were “too many unknowns” in relation to flooding and stated that the council had no plans to address issues at the site.
Reynolds suggested “fundamental problems” with surrounding roads had also created a “serious stumbling block” for the plan.
The Banff councillor brought up the potential loss of open space too, saying there was “too much to lose”.
He explained: “For generations there was a purpose that this was given up to the community, and we mustn’t lose that to a supermarket because those memories are precious.
“If we allow this application to proceed, future generations will not have those memories that many local people have cherished over the years.”
Reynolds suggested the only way round this was for the national retailer to submit a fresh application that addressed these issues.
Councillor John Cox stressed that Banff was “open for business” and would welcome future retail applications.
He said: “Quite clearly there is a huge demand for a supermarket in the area.
“We’ve witnessed huge bottlenecks at the bridge and by adding another junction without mitigation, it will have a significant impact.
“Without that there could be accidents which means that extremely busy A947 road would be blocked, there has to be action taken on that.”
The Banff member added: “We have to send out a positive signal that the Banff and Macduff area does require investment and a good supermarket.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here