POLICE are “assessing” a report of hate speech made against MP Lee Anderson after he accused the mayor of London of being controlled by Islamists.
Scotland Yard said a report was received a day after the former Tory deputy chairman made the remarks that unleashed an Islamophobia row.
The Ashfield MP was stripped of the Conservative whip over the weekend after he claimed that “Islamists” had “got control” of Sadiq Khan – and that the first Muslim London mayor had “given away our capital” to extremists.
READ MORE: Lee Anderson panned as he attacks media over 'Islamophobia' row
The Metropolitan Police does not provide information on named individuals. However, after a report in the Sun newspaper, the force said on Wednesday: “A report was made to police on Saturday, 24 February. Officers are assessing this report.”
The assessment could result in a full investigation or a dismissal because of a lack of sufficient evidence.
Anderson’s comments sparked outrage across the political spectrum.
But the MP, who is now sitting in the House of Commons as an independent, has continued to refuse to apologise – despite admitting he does "not really understand what [Islamophobia] means" – and said Rishi Sunak made a “mistake” in suspending him.
He has not ruled out standing for Reform UK, formerly known as the Brexit Party, at the next election.
GB News, the right-wing broadcaster that pays Anderson a £100,000 salary on top of his £86,584 MP pay to present a show on its network, reported that he met Reform leader Richard Tice on Sunday, only 24 hours after being deprived of his Tory affiliation in the Commons.
Senior Conservatives have described Anderson’s attack on Khan as “wrong” but have so far stopped short of describing them as “Islamophobic”.
The Labour London mayor has urged the Prime Minister to call the remarks racist and Islamophobic.
Critics said Sunak’s reluctance to describe the comments as Islamophobic was “weak”.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here