THE SNP have called for a "full, independent investigation" into new revelations which they say prove the Labour Party deliberately sought to wreck the SNP motion on a ceasefire in Gaza.
During a Channel 4 News interview with Chris Bryant on Sunday night, the Labour MP admitted he was ordered to filibuster to block progress on the SNP's motion for an immediate ceasefire - and accepted “we brought ourselves terribly into disrepute”.
Asked by presenter Cathy Newman whether he was "put up" to filibuster the debate, or took it upon himself to do so, Bryant admitted "a bit of both if I'm honest".
READ MORE: SNP approach Labour and LibDems ahead of Gaza ceasefire debate redux
"I think the whole day was grubby, and we need a system that doesn't allow people to manipulate the rules to be able to get what they want," he said, before laughing when asked if he manipulated the rules to get his way.
The SNP have insisted this revelation shows that UK Labour leader Keir Starmer used "dirty tricks" to stop the party's motion being debated, and called for an investigation to be held.
It follows a series of damning allegations about the row over the weekend.
Starmer is believed to have used the time afforded by his party’s filibuster attempts to "barge his way in" uninvited into an unprompted meeting with Speaker Lindsay Hoyle.
Hoyle would then break parliamentary convention, going against the advice of his Clerks, to benefit the Labour Party leader by allowing the party's amendment to be heard, meaning that MPs would not get the chance to formally vote on the SNP's motion calling for an immediate ceasefire in Gaza.
According to the Sunday Times, the Speaker "kicked out" clerks from the Reasons Room in order to speak to Starmer privately ahead of the vote.
Labour MPs gathered behind the Speaker’s chair allegedly were heard talking loudly of how “Keir is going to fix the Speaker” and Labour whip Chris Elmore was heard telling MPs to “use every procedural measure possible to delay”.
Starmer "emerged smiling" following the meeting, the newspaper reports.
In an interview with the BBC last week, Starmer refused to answer three times whether his MPs had threatened the Speaker after senior Labour Party sources told BBC journalist Nick Watt that "the Speaker was left in no doubt that Labour would bring him down after the general election unless he called Labour’s Gaza amendment".
Following the comments by Bryant, SNP MP Kirsty Blackman blasted: "These damning revelations show Sir Keir Starmer pulled every dirty trick in the Westminster book to wreck the SNP's vote on an immediate ceasefire in Gaza and Israel.
READ MORE: Scotland has a right to independence, says European Left
“After months of opposing an immediate ceasefire, and even defending Israel’s right to withhold water and power from Gaza, it's shameful that Starmer sought to derail this important debate - with his party filibustering, bullying the Speaker, and seeking to water down the motion by removing any mention of the collective punishment of the people in Gaza.
"Starmer's party has been caught red-handed following the admission by Chris Bryant. There must now be a full, independent investigation into the appalling behaviour of Keir Starmer and his colleagues, who are no better than the Tories when it comes to manipulating the broken Westminster system.
"The SNP will continue to press the UK government to call for an immediate ceasefire and take concrete steps to secure one. If Starmer is serious about securing a ceasefire, he should stop working against our efforts and, instead, work with us to change the UK government’s position.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel