THE Scottish Government ’s Social Justice Secretary will argue people in receipt of benefits would have better protections and more dignity in an independent Scotland at a Holyrood debate on Tuesday.
Secretary Shirley-Anne Somerville will tell MSPs that ministers would be able to build on the progress the Scottish Government has already made in creating a fairer system with limited powers.
The debate will focus on the recently published proposals for Social Security in an Independent Scotland.
READ MORE: Scotland to see 'record investment' in social security, says minister
It comes after analysis in January, by the independent Scottish Fiscal Commission. found that social protection was the only area of Scottish Government spending which has seen rapid growth over the past three years.
It said this was “a result of UK-wide trends for rising spending on disability benefits as well as Scottish Government commitments on social security and the linking of payment rates to inflation”.
Somerville will also renew calls for the UK Government to introduce an ‘essentials guarantee’ to ensure that social security benefits are always enough to cover the cost of basic vital items such as food and heating.
The Secretary is expected to say: “Our early priorities would be removing policies like the two-child limit, the rape clause and the benefit cap. We plan to replace the Universal Credit advanced loans with grants, we could end the punitive sanctions regime and we could remove the young parent penalty. We also propose to roll back planned changes to reserved sickness and disability benefits and to do more to help unpaid carers.
“These are early changes we would prioritise among others, to directly improve the lives of people in receipt of benefits and make the right steps towards an essentials guarantee.
“The best performing independent countries of Scotland’s size show that a strong social safety net can be the foundation of a dynamic, innovative and productive economy. I have no doubt that over time, Scotland can match the performance of other independent European countries that have low levels of poverty and inequality and high levels of economic success.
“With independence Scotland has potential to deliver transformational change building on our success to date, bringing a fairer, more equal society and ensuring everyone has enough money to live a decent, dignified, healthy life.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel