DAVID Cameron squirmed as he was confronted with his own words describing how Israel refused to restore Gaza’s water supplies – as he insisted the country had not committed war crimes.
Facing his first question-and-answer session with MPs since his surprise appointment as Foreign Secretary late last year, Lord Cameron admitted he worried whether Israel’s actions were in line with international humanitarian law.
But he insisted he had not been given any legal advice the country was committing war crimes.
Speaking at the Foreign Affairs Committee, Lord Cameron said: “You see lots of things and [ask], ‘Well, is that in line with international [humanitarian law]… is that?’
“So that’s a process that the Foreign Office has to go through to look at those instances to put questions as part of this process to the Israeli authorities, to consider those answers and to give me the considered advice, given all that, does that mean we think that Israel is in breach of human rights…international humanitarian law.”
But he was confronted by SNP MP Brendan O’Hara (below), who read back comments the Foreign Secretary had made earlier in the session, in which Lord Cameron had said he wanted Israel to restore Gaza’s water supply.
It is illegal for occupying states to cut off supplies of the countries or areas under occupation and Lord Cameron also earlier told MPs Israel was “de facto” occupying Gaza.
O’Hara said: “About two or three minutes ago you said to the chair, and I quote: ‘One of the things we’d like the Israelis to do is switch the water back on.’
READ MORE: David Cameron calls for 'sustainable' ceasefire alongside Germany's Foreign Secretary
“Now that says that they turned it off. It says that you recognise that they have the power to turn it on. Therefore, isn’t turning water off and having the ability to turn it back on but choosing not to, isn’t that a breach of international humanitarian law?”
Lord Cameron replied: “It’s just something they ought to do, in my opinion.”
He went on to say that he was not a lawyer and so could not comment.
Committee chair Alicia Kearns (above) pressed the former prime minister further, asking: “You’ve never had a piece of paper put in front of you by a Foreign Office lawyer that says that Israel is in breach of international humanitarian commitments, under international humanitarian law?”
READ MORE: Israel to defend itself at United Nations court over genocide claim
Lord Cameron replied: “Look, the reason for not answering this question, I can’t recall every single bit of paper that’s put in front of me. I look at everything.
“I mean, of course, there are lots of things that have happened, where you think ‘Well, surely that is, that was something that shouldn’t have happened’.
“So I don’t want to answer that question.”
Kearns, the Tory MP for Rutland, interrupted: “Forgive me, in 2013 you were quite happy to say from the despatch box that war crimes had been committed by the Assad regime when it came to chemical weapons use and two years later you were happy to say that Hamas had committed a war crime when they shot rockets into Israel.”
The Foreign Secretary insisted her examples were not comparable to the actions of Israel but added: “If you’re asking me, am I worried that Israel has taken action that might be in breach of international law because this particular premises has been bombed or whatever? Yes of course I’m worried about that and that’s why I consult the Foreign Office lawyers when giving this advice on arms exports.”
It comes after South Africa accused Israel at a UN court of having committed genocide in Gaza.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel