MORE than 1000 people have written to the Scottish Government urging them to “call in” and reject a controversially approved plan to build a golf course on a protected nature reserve.
The Scottish Greens have been urging people to write to Planning Minister Joe FitzPatrick to lodge their concerns after Highland Council approved the plans for Coul Links, near Dornoch in the Highlands.
The Coul Links dune system forms part of the Loch Fleet Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI) and the Dornoch Firth and Loch Fleet Special Protection Area (SPA). It is also protected as a “Ramsar site” under the international Convention on Wetlands, which was signed in 1971.
In December, Highland Council approved plans to build on the dune system.
READ MORE: First Minister challenged over plans for golf course on protected Scottish site
While the decision was welcomed by developers Communities for Coul Limited (C4C), environmental charities urged ministers to step in to block its progression – as they previously did for a similar application on the same site in 2020.
It is understood that NatureScot have opposed the plans. As a statutory consultee, the agency's objection means ministers will have to be notified of the application. This is set to happen in the new year.
From there, the Government will decide whether to approve the plans, or call them in for an inquiry.
The Scottish Greens have set up a petition which sees people write to FitzPatrick (below) calling for the plans to be rejected. At the time of writing, 1182 people have raised an objection.
The party wrote: “Coul Links is one of the last areas of undeveloped, species-rich dune habitat in Scotland. It's a spectacular site of environmental and scientific significance, holding several important international environmental designations.
“Three years ago American billionaires Todd Warnock and Mike Keiser tried to build a golf course on top of it. Thousands of you from across the country joined our campaign to defeat that scheme, protecting this rare ecosystem and the wide variety of plant and animal life that calls it home.
“The campaign was successful and planning permission was refused in 2020. But now this stunning, publicly accessible site is once again at risk of being exploited for private gain.
“A new application for an 18-hole golf course, practice area and car park has been submitted. Swayed by flimsy promises of jobs – regardless of the cost to an irreplaceable wild landscape and the nature and tourism that it supports – Highland Council have narrowly voted to approve the application. They do so in the face of objections from their own planning officers, NatureScot, the RSPB, Ramblers Scotland and the Scottish Wildlife Trust.
READ MORE: Billionaire behind golf course plans donated to groups challenging science on climate
“Support the fight to protect the links and the rare species that live there by writing to the minister in charge to ask him to once again call in the planning application and reverse this destructive decision.”
The party has also drafted a letter for people to send to FitzPatrick on the issue.
Developers C4C claim the course will create up to 400 new jobs and generate more than £11m annually for the local economy.
Director Gordon Sutherland said: “Our plans, which have had the backing of local people from the outset, offer a genuine chance to create much-needed new employment opportunities in an area where the working age population is falling, threatening the future viability of fragile communities.
"They also provide a guaranteed future for the wonderful wild coastal environment of Coul Links, which is currently sadly neglected and at risk."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel