RISHI Sunak intervened to reverse the scrapping of a contract that provides helicopter transport for him and other senior ministers, it has emerged.
The Ministry of Defence had been expected to end the £40 million helicopter rental contract, after confirming that it wanted to ensure “available funds are prioritised on key areas”.
The decision was taken by Defence Secretary Ben Wallace. Sunak has faced criticism for his frequent use of helicopters for sometimes short-distance journeys.
But the move, first reported by the Sunday Times, was reversed when Grant Shapps replaced Wallace as Defence Secretary.
Writing in an RAF in-house magazine, the leader of the squadron that crews the helicopters said that the Prime Minister had personally intervened to row back on the decision.
Tom Woods wrote in the Northolt Approach: “In Jul 23 the previous SofS for Defence, The Rt Hon Ben Wallace, announced the termination of the RotaryWing Command Support Air Transport (RW CSAT) capability which would cease operating on 30 Sep 23.
“However, in mid-September 23, the new SofS Defence, The Rt Hon Grant Shapps, reversed the decision at the request of the Prime Minister. There was frenetic activity… to rapidly ensure all the key elements required to allow A109 to continue service were in place.”
Sunak’s intervention saw the Ministry of Defence contract temporarily extended, according to the squadron leader.
READ MORE: Ukraine in from the cold of diplomatic winter
A UK Government spokesman said: “All ministerial and senior defence official travel is undertaken using efficient and cost-effective travel arrangements.
“This contract was extended primarily in order to provide travel for the command functions of the Ministry of Defence.
“As a whole, domestic flights within the United Kingdom allow ministers to visit more parts of the United Kingdom in the time available, particularly areas further away from London, and reduce the need for overnight accommodation for ministers and accompanying staff.
“Security considerations are also taken into account.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel