AN audience member on Question Time appeared to claim that Scotland would have no “influence” if it rejoined the EU as an independent country.
Last night’s show was broadcast from Kelso, with one person asking if Scottish independence was now a “pipe dream”.
Justice Secretary Angela Constance disputed the suggestion, saying independence was the “only choice that will secure the economic future of this country”.
One audience member seemed less convinced however, as he said: “How independent would Scotland be if we’ve got the Germans and the French telling us what to do when we get this independence?”
Man makes case against Scottish Independence saying they'll have no influence if Scotland joins the EU.
— Farrukh (@implausibleblog) December 14, 2023
At the same time he says, "We have influence with the UK gov because we have MPs there"
Anyone want to tell him about MEPs? 🙃 #BBCQT pic.twitter.com/2GgL5C3Cua
Host Fiona Bruce quickly interjected to clarify if the man was discussing a future in which Scotland was back in the EU.
He replied: “If we got independence and we rejoined the EU then what independence do we have.
“At least with the UK Government we have influence, we have MPs there. We can do something with it.
“We will have no say, we will be a nation of five million people at the very end of Europe that no one or very few will listen to in Brussels.”
READ MORE: BBC 'cancels' SNP MP's Radio 4 appearance after grilling chair candidate
The clip was widely shared on social media with many taking issue with the points raised.
One user commented: “Man makes case against Scottish independence saying they’ll have no influence if Scotland joins the EU.
“At the same time he says, ‘we have influence with the UK Gov because we have MPs there’. Anyone want to tell him about MEPs?”
Another said: “Brexit, Alister Jack (below), Covid, Gaza. All examples of our lack of influence in the Union.”
A third meanwhile asked what “influence” the man could see Scotland having within the UK right now.
Meanwhile, Constance said independence was the only “possible route back into the EU” and that it would allow for “transformational change” to Scotland’s economy.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel