GARY Lineker may have breached BBC social media guidelines with a Twitter/X spat with Tory MPs, according to the Government’s candidate to be the corporation’s new chair.
The Match of the Day presenter found himself embroiled in an online row with backbencher Jonathan Gullis who criticised Lineker for signing an open letter against the Government’s Rwanda bill.
And he also took aim at Defence Secretary Grant Shapps, after the minister suggested the former England striker was “meddling” in politics.
Tory MPs have accused Lineker of breaching the BBC’s new social media rules, which had to be brought in as a result of a separate row between the presenter and the corporation earlier this year.
Under questioning at the Common’s media committee, Samir Shah, who has been nominated to chair the BBC, said Lineker’s tweets may have breached the corporation's social media rules.
READ MORE: Gary Lineker attacks Tory MP Jonathan Gullis in BBC 'impartiality' spat
Asked by Damian Green MP if he thought Lineker was giving the BBC “two fingers” with his political posts, Shah added: “Were I to be chair, first of all I would be thinking if we have the balance right between freedom of expression and the duty to be impartial, it’s very clear when it comes to news and current affairs and when it’s not, but there is this grey area in which Mr Lineker sits and I share your frustration and I would invite the director-general and his team to find a solution.”
But he said signing the letter was not in itself a breach of the rules.
Shah said he did not think it was “helpful” that Lineker had signed a letter calling for the Government to scrap its Rwanda scheme and for political leaders to come up with a “fair new plan for refugees” but did not see that as a breach of the rules.
Speaking before MPs at a pre-appointment hearing, he said: “I don’t think it was very helpful either for Gary Lineker or the BBC or the cause he supports because it becomes a story about Gary Lineker and the BBC.”
He added: “As far as I’m aware, the signing of the letter did not breach those guidelines.
“But the more recent tweet in which he identifies a politician does, on the face of it, seem to breach those guidelines.
“I’m not sure how egregious it is but I imagine the BBC is looking into it and considering its response.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel