A COURT ruling on whether the UK Government can veto gender reforms passed by a majority of MSPs in Holyrood is due on Friday December 8.
Following two days of hearing in September, Lady Haldane is due to give her judgment on the case.
It is expected her written judgment will be made available around midday.
The Gender Recognition Reform Bill was passed by two-thirds of MSPs in the Scottish Parliament in December 2022.
However, Scottish Secretary Alister Jack made the unprecedented decision to use a Section 35 order, which blocked the legislation from becoming law in Scotland.
The much debated legislation seeks to simplify the process of legally changing gender.
READ MORE: Covid Inquiry: Boris Johnson defends 'let Covid rip' comments
The bill removed the requirement to have a medical diagnosis of gender dysphoria before being able to attain a Gender Recognition Certificate.
It also reduced the age a person can apply from 18-years-old to 16 and cut the amount of time they had live in their acquired gender before being permitted to legally change gender from two-years to three to six months.
However, critics said the legislation posed a threat to women's safety by collapsing the distinction between sex and gender and claimed it would imperil the provision of single-sex spaces.
The bill was passed by a cross-party majority of MSPs before being blocked by the UK Government.
READ MORE: First Minister quizzed on golf course plans at protected Scottish site
It was described as a "full-frontal" attack on the Scottish Parliament by then first minister Nicola Sturgeon, who vowed to fight the veto in the courts.
In September, the Scottish Government's top lawyer, Lord Advocate Dorothy Bain KC, argued in the Court of Session that Jack's actions were based on a "policy disagreement" and therefore unlawful.
However, a UK Government law officer argued that such a claim was "irrelevant" and that Jack had "justified grounds" for using the Section 35 order.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel