ON Tuesday morning – a particularly chilly one – I made my way over to Pollockshaws Burgh Hall to speak with Anas Sarwar with other members of the press.
The National’s invitation went mysteriously missing (we only knew about the meet via a good samaritan) and my RSVP, and follow-up RSVP, were ignored by the party’s press office.
It’s as if they didn’t want us there.
But here we were, and it was clear that there was one particular question journalists wanted to ask – what did Sarwar think of head honcho Keir Starmer’s Sunday Telegraph comments in which he praised Margaret Thatcher in an apparent appeal to Tory voters.
Sarwar was pretty steadfast in his criticism of the former prime minister but refused to condemn his boss’s comments.
To the contrary, he argued the focus on the story was the fault of the article headline and SNP press releases.
But what surely did Sarwar expect when his boss decided a comment piece in the Telegraph is the right time to name Thatcher alongside former Labour prime ministers Tony Blair and Clement Attlee as those leaders in modern British politics who sought to deliver “meaningful change” by acting “in service of the British people, rather than dictating to them”.
How else are people supposed to read into that? Especially given this is a woman that Sarwar himself said had “decimated” Scottish communities.
And despite being far from the only publication or broadcaster to ask about the comments, Sarwar still decided to take another pop at The National – as is his wont.
Instead of answering my follow-up question about The Independent reporting that Starmer’s team blocked criticism of Thatcher in 2021 – which would point to a trend – he suggested that National journalists should instead be condemning comments made by Alex Salmond in 2008 – a full 6 years before this paper was founded and 15 years after he made them.
He said: “I would love to have seen The National – they might not have been a publication then – but journalists now calling out Alex Salmond, one of the heroes of the nationalist movement despite being a disgraced politician now, who said that Scotland didn’t mind the economic policies of Thatcher.”
It’s just another in a long line of pops from Sarwar - often directed at my colleague Abbi – singling out National journalists for perfectly valid questions.
Yes – as typically the only pro-independence outlet – we can often take a different tact. If Sarwar is serious about speaking to those in the Yes movement, he should do so too.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel