RISHI Sunak’s Rwanda deportation policy is doomed to fail, Suella Braverman has said as no confidence letters in the Prime Minister are reportedly making Number 10 "worried".
The former home secretary, who was sacked from her Cabinet job last month, warned that the “time for talk” on tackling illegal immigration is over as she piled fresh pressure on the Prime Minister over his strategy to stop small boats.
The Prime Minister is due to give an emergency press conference at 11am on Thursday.
It comes after Robert Jenrick’s resignation as immigration minister just hours after Sunak tabled a draft bill which compels judges to treat Rwanda as a safe country after the Supreme Court ruled the scheme was unlawful over risks to refugees.
Jenrick said the draft bill “does not go far enough” and is a “triumph of hope over experience”.
READ MORE: Covid Inquiry: Boris Johnson will feel the real fire tomorrow
The legislation, which must be voted on by Parliament, gives ministers the powers to disregard sections of the Human Rights Act.
But it does not go as far as allowing them to dismiss the European Convention on Human Rights, as hardliners including Braverman have demanded.
Braverman’s outspokenness on the issue and Jenrick’s dramatic resignation signals a growing right-wing rebellion that could threaten Sunak’s premiership.
Cabinet minister Chris Heaton-Harris attempted to play down Tory divisions over the Rwanda policy following Jenrick’s departure.
Asked if the vote on the Safety of Rwanda Bill would be treated as a matter of confidence in the Prime Minister, the Northern Ireland Secretary told Sky News that was a decision for the whips but “I can’t see why it would need to be because I think all Conservatives will vote for it”.
READ MORE: Robert Jenrick criticises Rishi Sunak in resignation statement
Asked if the Prime Minister would face a confidence vote, Heaton-Harris told LBC: “I think it’s highly unlikely, very unlikely. I’d say vanishingly small.”
Braverman had told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme: “Taken as a whole and looking at the reality of the challenges that are involved in detaining people, removing people and getting them to Rwanda – this is a very litigious field and there are lots of legal frameworks that apply – the reality is and the sorry truth is that it won’t work and it will not stop the boats.”
Tweaks to the Rwanda plan would not be enough to get people on the plane to Africa, Braverman said, adding that the new legislation would still allow legal claims that could block flights and “clog up the system”, potentially for years.
“We can’t do half measures. We have to totally exclude international law – the Refugee Convention, other broader avenues of legal challenge,” she said.
Braverman, who said on Wednesday that the Conservatives faced “electoral oblivion in a matter of months” if they introduced emergency Rwanda legislation which is “destined to fail”, denied the Tories have a “death wish”.
But she said they are in a “very perilous situation”.
“The Prime Minister made the promise to stop the boats at the beginning of the year. We now need to deliver on that pledge,” she said.
“The time for talk, the time for slogans and promises is over. We need to show delivery and that’s what this debate right now is all about.”
She insisted she wants the Prime Minister to succeed, despite describing him as “weak” and “uncertain” in a scathing attack on his leadership after he sacked her.
But she said Sunak would have to change course if he wants to lead the party into the next election.
Challenged over her actions and her controversial style, the ex-home secretary said she does not “shy away from telling people how it is”, even if “that upsets polite society”.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel