THE UK will not share evidence of war crimes in Gaza if it is collected during reconnaissance flights over Palestine, The National has learned.
Defence Secretary Grant Shapps told the Commons on Tuesday that the UK was flying manned but unarmed planes over Palestine in a bid to identify British hostages held by Hamas.
He was under pressure from MPs to confirm whether evidence – if found – of war crimes being committed by either side in Palestine would be shared with the International Criminal Court.
In a statement released at the weekend, the department said: “Only information relating to hostage rescue will be passed to the relevant authorities responsible for hostage rescue.”
The Ministry of Defence has now said the flights were “purely for intelligence gathering” related to returning UK hostages held by Hamas and ruled out it being shared with The Hague.
An official also told The National the information would not be shared with the Israeli government for its military operations in Gaza, which has now escalated to a full invasion of the strip.
The brutal conflict has so far claimed the lives of 15,900 Palestinians and 1200 Israelis since Hamas’s unprecedented attack on Israel on October 7.
UN chief Antonio Guterres (above) has condemned “clear violations of international law” in Gaza in response to Israel’s bombardment of the strip.
The UK Government has previously said it considers Israel’s actions to be within the bounds of international law, which prohibits the collective punishment of civilians.
The US has appeared to put increasing pressure on Israel after the short truce with Hamas ended on Saturday.
The Times of Israel reported earlier in the day that an anonymous Israel Defence Forces official had confirmed that roughly two Palestinian civilians have been killed for every dead Hamas fighter in the Gaza Strip.
It comes amid reports just 5000 Hamas fighters had been killed by Israel’s ferocious response to the October 7 attacks, which saw more than 240 hostages taken into Gaza as well as 1200 Israelis killed.
Amnesty International has also accused Israel of firing white phosphorous into neighbouring Lebanon – the base of Islamist militant group Hezbollah – which would be a contravention of an international ban on the use of chemical weapons.
READ MORE: Israel drops leaflets in southern Gaza urging residents to leave
The human rights charity has previously demanded an investigation into an alleged “indiscriminate” attack on Dhayra, near the Israeli border, which was said to have injured at least nine civilians in early October.
Hamas’s documented tactic of using human shields, by basing its operations near or in civilian buildings that are supposed to be off-limits, is also considered a war crime under international law.
The UK and Palestine are state parties to the International Criminal Court, which sits in The Hague and was established in 2002, while Israel is not.
Israel not being a state party to the International Criminal Court would not prevent it from escaping its jurisdiction if the court launched proceedings against it.
At the end of October, International Criminal Court prosecutor Karim A.A. Khan KC called on all state parties "to share evidence regarding any allegations or any crimes [in the conflict] so that we can properly investigate them and prosecute them as appropriate".
'Israel commits its atrocities in darkness'
Former Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn (below) said it was “shameful” that information would not be passed to the court.
He said: “The UK Government has a responsibility to defend the equal application of international law.
“It is shameful, therefore, that the UK Government refuses to support the International Criminal Court in its efforts to bring about justice for war crimes committed by all parties.
READ MORE: Keir Starmer drafts in Tony Blair to help build relations with Israel
“Blackouts in Gaza may be temporary, but impunity is permanent — and our government continues to give the Israeli army the political cover it needs to commit its atrocities in darkness.”
SNP defence spokesperson Martin Docherty-Hughes added: "There should be no question of the UK sharing the information it receives from these flights with the International Criminal Court.
"Given the UN Secretary General has reiterated the ‘clear violations of international humanitarian law’ evidenced by Israel's actions in Gaza, you would think that there would be a clear responsibility from this Government to make sure its own actions are above reproach.
"The UK Government refusing to openly support the International Criminal Court investigation certainly makes them look foolish.
"It also begs the question, what alternative will the UK Government offer in the furtherance of the rule of law and in the search of justice for innocent victims in both Palestine and Israel, other than the investigations of an independent court?”
'All lawbreakers must be held accountable'
LibDem defence spokesperson Richard Foord (below) said the revelation was “troubling” and criticised Shapps for slippery answers in the Commons chamber earlier on Tuesday.
He said: “The Government is not being straight with the public about what information is being shared with whom.
“The fact that any evidence of breaches of International Humanitarian Law recorded by UK personnel will not be passed to the International Criminal Court is troubling.
“All those responsible for breaches of humanitarian law, from any side of this conflict, must be held to account.”
The Defence Secretary repeatedly told MPs information would be shared with “partners” when questioned about whether intelligence would be handed over to the court.
But he said he could see "no circumstances" in which the Government would deploy British troops to Gaza.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel