THE British monarchy has suffered “long-lasting reputational damage” following a row which has seen two royals named as being at the heart of racism allegations, a royal commentator has said.
King Charles and Kate, the Princess of Wales, have been widely named as the pair who are alleged to have raised “concerns” during family discussions about how dark the skin of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex’s son might be before he was born.
Their names were first published in the Dutch edition of journalist Omid Scobie’s book Endgame, about the future of the royal family, which was quickly pulled from the shelves after the disclosure, which was not present in the English language version.
The BBC and many national newspapers followed the lead of broadcaster Piers Morgan, who named the two royal figures on his TalkTV show on Wednesday night.
READ MORE: BBC under fire for new royal editor role amid swingeing cuts
The Prince and Princess of Wales were the first members of the royal family to face public questions about the race row, when a member of the press shouted out to them when they arrived at the Royal Variety Performance on Thursday night.
William was asked: “Your royal highness, have you got a comment about Omid Scobie’s book?”
Another question was directed at the couple: “Did you watch the Piers Morgan show last night, your royal highnesses?”
The couple did not respond to either question.
The row has overshadowed the King’s address to COP28, the UN Climate Change summit hosted by Dubai, where he warned global leaders the world remains “dreadfully far off track” in key climate targets and called for meaningful change.
Joe Little of Majesty magazine said: “The allegations, true or untrue, will clearly put doubt in the minds of people who are aware of the individuals who have been named. That can’t be helpful in any shape or form.
“But mud sticks, once the shadow of doubt is there it never really goes away, and it’s got to impact not only on the individuals but also the institution as a whole – it’s a long-lasting reputational damage.”
It is understood all options are being considered by Buckingham Palace following the publication of the two names.
Focus within the royal household is firmly on the King’s diary, especially with his appearance on the world stage in Dubai this week.
READ MORE: New poll shows 'record' support for abolishing the monarchy
In their interview with Oprah Winfrey in 2021, Harry and Meghan alleged an unidentified member of the monarchy – but not Queen Elizabeth II or her husband, the Duke of Edinburgh – had raised “concerns and conversations about how dark his skin might be when he’s born”.
Scobie claims in his book that the names were discussed in letters exchanged between the Duchess of Sussex and the King.
During an appearance on BBC’s Newsnight, Scobie said a “full investigation” was being carried out into how the names appeared in the Dutch edition of his book.
When asked if the “buck stops” with him he replied: “It doesn’t stop with me because there are irresponsible people in this country that have broken the law and repeated names that should never have been repeated, should never be named.
“The book I wrote, the book I edited, the book I signed off on did not have names. So I’m as frustrated as everyone else."
Buckingham Palace declined to comment and Kensington Palace has been contacted for a comment.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel