MATT Hancock accused Dominic Cummings of creating a “culture of fear” in Government that undermined the pandemic response as he defended his record as health secretary at the UK Covid-19 Inquiry.
The former minister painted Boris Johnson’s ex-chief adviser as a “malign actor” who subjected Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) staff to abuse as they grappled with the emergence of Covid-19.
Cummings sought to grab power from the then-prime minister while shutting out ministers from key meetings, the inquiry heard.
Hancock played a key role in the response to the pandemic but his performance has been repeatedly criticised by a number of other witnesses including Cummings, who said he was a “proven liar”.
Hitting back as he gave evidence to the UK Covid-19 Inquiry on Thursday, the former health secretary said Cummings (below) had attempted to exert influence over decision-making in a way that was “inappropriate in a democracy”.
“As the Cobra system was running in February, the prime minister’s chief adviser decided that he didn’t like the Cobra system – that’s on the record – and he decided instead to take all of the major daily decisions into his office and he invited a subset of the people who needed to be there to these meetings,” Hancock told the inquiry.
Cummings 'power grab'
“He didn’t invite any ministers. He didn’t regard ministers as a valuable contribution to any decision-making as far as I could see in the crisis or, indeed, any other time.”
He added: “The reason these meetings are important is because there is a proper Government emergency response system and it was actively circumvented and in one of these early meetings the chief adviser said decisions don’t need to go to the prime minister.
READ MORE: Dominic Cummings confronted over 'misogynistic' texts at Covid inquiry
“Now that is inappropriate in a democracy. I saw it simply as essentially a power-grab but it definitely got in the way of organising the response for the period it was in operation.”
Hancock rejected claims he lied to colleagues about ways in which the pandemic was being dealt with, describing these as “false allegations”.
Instead he pointed the finger at Cummings for, he suggested, presiding over an atmosphere in which blame was assigned rather than allowing people to “spend all of their effort solving the problems”.
“It was deeply, deeply frustrating… we’ve discussed the structural problem which was essentially an adviser trying to take executive authority away from the prime minister for a period until the cabinet secretary stopped it and put in place the MIG (Ministerial Implementation Group) process,” Hancock (below) said.
“But there was also effectively a cultural problem which is that there was a culture of fear inculcated by the behaviour of this particular individual.
“He did in the middle of this, in the middle of February, effectively cause the resignation of the chancellor of the exchequer.”
Hancock's critics
Critics have questioned the former health secretary’s record on Covid testing, nursing homes and asymptomatic testing, which Cummings said Hancock claimed would not work.
Also known for his appearance last year on TV’s I’m A Celebrity… Get Me Out Of Here!, Hancock’s political career was torpedoed after footage emerged in 2021 of his embrace with aide Gina Coladangelo which broke social distancing guidelines.
But in Thursday’s evidence he insisted that he had taken “precautionary” measures, in some cases overriding the scientific advice he had been given, and described himself as being in the “pro-let’s worry about asymptomatic transmission camp”.
As an example, guidance from Public Health England (PHE) during the early pandemic was that there was not a need to quarantine people being brought back from Wuhan in China – which he overruled, Hancock said.
He denied there had been an “absence of a plan” and insisted his department “rose to the challenge” of responding to the biggest public health crisis in a century.
Extracts from former chief scientific adviser to the Government Sir Patrick Vallance’s diaries read out by Keith complained of a “massive internal mess inside DHSC and PHE”.
They recorded that then-cabinet secretary Lord Mark Sedwill said there was a “clear lack of grip in DHSC”.
In response, Hancock told the inquiry: “It’s normal for the centre, the Cabinet Office, to be sceptical of departments.”
READ MORE: Dominic Cummings was Prime Minister ‘in all but name’, Covid Inquiry hears
He added: “I think that the toxic culture that you’ve seen at the centre of Government, that’s been the subject of much discussion, was unhelpful in assuming that when anything was difficult or a challenge, therefore there was somehow fault and blame.”
While Hancock accepted the DHSC had not got everything right, he said his department had “effectively” tried to “raise the alarm” as early as January, but its concerns were not taken as seriously as they should have been.
“We were on occasions blocked,” he told the inquiry.
Hancock said he and the DHSC faced “deep unpleasantness” from the centre of Government during the early months of the pandemic while the rest of Whitehall was slow to react.
“A healthy culture involves scepticism, an unhealthy culture involves false allegations and extremely unpleasant language,” he said.
Reacting to Hancock’s evidence in a lengthy broadside on Twitter/X, Cummings said he was “outright lying” and “talking rubbish” to the inquiry.
'Nuclear levels of overconfidence'
Other senior figures have questioned Hancock’s approach in their evidence, with the inquiry hearing that the country’s most senior civil servant at the time, Lord Sedwill, wanted the minister sacked.
In one WhatsApp exchange with the permanent secretary at Number 10 Simon Case – who is the current Cabinet Secretary – Lord Sedwill joked it was necessary to remove Hancock to “save lives and protect the NHS”.
WhatsApp messages shared with the inquiry also revealed that Cummings repeatedly pushed Johnson to fire the former minister.
At one stage, Cummings claimed Hancock had “lied his way through this and killed people and dozens and dozens of people have seen it”.
Helen MacNamara (above), who served as deputy cabinet secretary, also claimed in her evidence that Hancock displayed “nuclear levels” of overconfidence and a pattern of reassuring colleagues the pandemic was being dealt with in ways that were not true.
Sir Christopher Wormald, a senior civil servant in the Department of Health, suggested it was a “very small number of people” claiming that the minister was “actually telling untruths”.
But he added that there were a lot who thought he was “overoptimistic” and “overpromised” on what could be delivered.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here