THE BBC says it would consider rescreening a controversial drama showing the Scottish independence campaign turning violent which has been locked away for 50 years.
The drama series Scotch on the Rocks, shown in 1973, depicted the Scottish Liberation Army taking over the town of Fort William, including battles on the streets.
It was based on a novel co-written by Douglas Hurd, who would go on to become Margaret Thatcher’s home secretary.
But it caused a storm of controversy after being screened as a five-part series at a time when the SNP’s Winnie Ewing had secured a surprise win in the Hamilton 1967 by-election and the party was doing well in the polls, while British troops were on the streets in Northern Ireland.
READ MORE: BBC announces major cuts to flagship programme Newsnight
After transmission, the BBC's Programmes Complaints Commission (PCC) upheld a complaint from the SNP, agreeing the use of the party's name and logo in the drama - which depicts the SNP leadership failing to condemn the Scottish Liberation Army's actions - created a risk that viewers would be left with the impression the real SNP was involved in violence.
The programme was never screened again.
However now the BBC has said it is “not impossible” it would consider showing it again – and appealed for help in tracking down two missing episodes.
Luke McCullough, BBC Scotland's head of corporate affairs, said: "Scotch on the Rocks was an iconic piece of TV drama made here in Scotland, but was never repeated following its original transmission due to the complaint being upheld about a key plot point in the first episode.
"With the passage of time, it's not impossible that the BBC could consider showing it again, with careful handling of material covered by the historic complaint - but with two of the five episodes currently missing from the BBC archive, a repeat remains unlikely.
READ MORE: Amir El-Masry breaks silence after Gaza ceasefire call censored by BBC
"If anyone still retains a copy of the missing two episodes, the BBC archive would be very happy to hear from them."
SNP president Michael Russell, who watched the series in 1973, said he would “love” to see it.
He told the BBC: "What it did do was to wake up the idea that there was something happening in Scotland that was to do with Scotland as a nation."
"People were writing fiction about the nation and quite a lot of people like me would think that this was really interesting. There's something here that we haven't thought about.
"When I look back on it I think what happened was it raised the consciousness in a curious way.”
He added: "I would love to see it again. I suspect it is rather dated. I suspect the production values have dated but it is a historical curiosity.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel