A SCOTTISH anti-monarchy group has said the news that King Charles’s estate will transfer more than £100 million into ethical investment funds is “nothing more than a PR exercise”.
It comes after The Guardian revealed earlier this week that the monarch was using the feudal concept of “bona vacantia” to hoover up the estates of people who died without a will or next of kin.
The newspaper found the funds had been used to renovate properties owned by the King, with the Duchy of Lancaster admitting it was used to finance the restoration of what it called “public and historic properties”.
In a statement given to The Guardian, a spokesperson for the Duchy said: “In line with the King’s longstanding support of ethical investing, the Duchy of Lancaster has begun the process of transferring its investment portfolio into ESG (ethical, social or environmental) funds.
READ MORE: Cost of UK Government's Queen Elizabeth House in Edinburgh revealed
“This process is expected to be completed by the end of the financial year.”
In response to the latest update, Scottish anti-monarchy campaign group Our Republic told The National it was “nothing more than a PR exercise”.
“This is a brazen example of ‘I’m not sorry I did it, I’m just sorry I got caught’," a spokesperson for the group said.
"Charles and his family have been profiting from the deaths of those they consider subjects for decades and it has never once crossed their thoughts that this morbid exploitation of ancient laws may not be right."
They added: “This change is nothing more than a PR exercise, but the damage is done. We thank those whose investigations [brought it] to light.
“The only way to bring this to an end is to remove the root cause of the outdated laws built around the royals – by bringing an end to the monarchy itself.”
READ MORE: EU independence paper offers ‘serious sustained case’, expert says
The Guardian also reported there has been no suggestion from the estate that it plans to cease collecting “bona vacantia” funds.
SNP MP Tommy Sheppard told The National: "It's absolutely shocking. You don't have to be a republican to know this isn't right. That money ought to go into some sort of charitable foundation that's used for the public good.
"I can think of quite a number of contenders for it to be honest whether it's children's charities or something else. Give it to Age UK who provide services for elderly people."
Scottish Greens MSP Maggie Chapman added: "It's astonishing that the monarchy is trying to greenwash such ill-gotten investments.
"You simply can't appear ethical after being caught taking tens of millions of pounds from the dead.
"Like the abhorrent, archaic feudal law they exploited to gain this wealth, the monarchy is long past its sell by date.
"It's time Scotland abolished this self-serving, anti-democratic institution for good."
Those thoughts were echoed by anti-monarchy campaign group Republic, who reacted to the news on social media by saying: “An admission of unethical investments, but they will still be investing money taken from the dead.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel