CHANCELLOR Jeremy Hunt announced two major tax cuts in his Autumn Statement and claimed the economy had “turned a corner” – but analysts have cast doubt on whether the measures are sustainable.

There are also questions over whether the crowd-pleasing tax cuts signal a General Election is more likely to take place in early 2024.

The main announcements

The two biggest announcements from the autumn statement were a pair of tax cuts billed as the biggest since the 1980s.

For employees, the Chancellor cut National Insurance from 12% to 10%, while the self-employed also received a cut in National Insurance in what amounts to a £10 billion tax giveaway.

For businesses, the decision to make the “full expensing” regime permanent delivers a tax cut of around £10bn in the hope that it will promote investment.

Despite pre-statement rumours, Hunt confirmed that benefits would be uprated by September’s inflation figure, not October’s, while the pensions triple lock will be maintained.

READ MORE: Jeremy Hunt's Autumn Statement is a ‘Tory con trick’, says SNP

The Chancellor also confirmed that the minimum wage would rise by almost 10%, along with changes to benefits rules intended to reduce the number of people deemed unfit to work.

The verdict from finance analysts

The independent Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) was more downbeat than the Chancellor, saying it was still forecasting the largest fall in living standards since records began in the 1950s, with disposable incomes 3.5% lower in the election year than they were before the pandemic.

The OBR has revised down its growth forecasts for the coming years, partly thanks to inflation remaining higher for longer than anticipated and not returning to its 2% target until the second half of 2025.

Despite the tax cuts, the OBR also expected the overall tax burden to continue rising over the next five years due in part to the decision to keep personal allowances frozen. The tax burden is now forecast to reach 38% of GDP by 2028/29 – its highest level since the Second World War.

The National:

Public services lose out to tax cuts

The Chancellor provided very little extra money for public services, choosing instead to spend his extra “headroom” on around £20bn in tax cuts.

In the context of persistent inflation, this means an effective squeeze on departmental budgets that some commentators have described as “implausible” and “unsustainable”.

The OBR said current plans suggested cuts to “unprotected” departments (budgets not including the NHS, schools, defence and overseas aid) of around 2.3% per year.

Paul Johnson, director of the Institute for Fiscal Studies, said of the squeeze on public service budgets: “There’s a material risk that those plans prove undeliverable and today’s tax cuts will not prove to be sustainable.”

Tory party divisions

Delivering two significant tax cuts is likely to have pleased restive Tory backbenchers who have long argued that overall tax levels are too high.

While the Chancellor has not given any faction everything it wanted, cutting taxes for both businesses and individuals will prove popular after last week’s reshuffle.

READ MORE: Jeremy Hunt confirms National Insurance cut in Autumn Statement

However, the OBR’s forecast that the tax burden will continue rising may limit any internal advantages that Hunt has secured and result in demands for further tax cuts.

A spring General Election?

The Autumn Statement may not have been purely a pre-election giveaway, but some measures will heighten expectations that an election could be coming in the first half of 2024.

Fast-tracking the cut in National Insurance to January instead of waiting for April means voters would already have begun to feel the benefit of it should the Prime Minister decide to hold a General Election in the spring.

The Chancellor’s announcements also gave a hint towards the argument the Conservatives could seek to mount as to why they deserve re-election.

Both Hunt and his deputy, Treasury Chief Secretary Laura Trott, have claimed the UK economy has “turned a corner” and will argue that replacing the Government could jeopardise that.