KEIR Starmer “watered down” parts of a major report on devolution, a mayor has claimed as he appealed to independence supporters to find allies in English campaigners fighting to take power away from Westminster.
North of Tyne mayor Jamie Driscoll said the Labour leader censored recommendations put forward by former prime minister Gordon Brown in his constitutional report.
Labour mayors were given advance sight of the document before it was reviewed by the Labour leader ahead of its publication, Driscoll said, only for key recommendations to be struck out.
Speaking ahead of his appearance at the Break Up of Britain Conference in Edinburgh today, Driscoll also urged independence supporters to find common cause with those south of the Border campaigning to devolve power away from London.
READ MORE: Jamie Driscoll: Keir Starmer's Labour government will be 'very unpopular very fast'
He said there had been “some genuine solid proposals” in Brown’s document, including a call to allow mayors to sponsor legislation in Parliament, before its publication in December last year – prior to it being screened by Starmer’s team.
“By the time it had gone through [Starmer’s office] it was all about Lords reform and the rest of it was dropped,” said Driscoll.
The mayor – who Starmer blocked from running as Labour's candidate in a new combined authority mayoral race in the north east of England earlier this year in a major row which saw Driscoll quit the party – said the party leader was afraid of rival power bases presented by local politicians.
Driscoll claimed Starmer also views Greater Manchester Mayor Andy Burnham as “the king across the water” and accused him of picking a political fight with London’s Sadiq Khan (below) over Ulez expansion.
But he argued more power should be devolved from Westminster, even though he believes it unlikely under a Starmer government.
Scottish independence supporters should back their campaign, Driscoll said – claiming it would prove his argument that problems are better solved outside of Westminster.
“Nobody thinks Westminster can fix anything,” he added.
“As your next-door neighbour I would say [to Scotland]: don’t treat us like Westminster. You actually have allies here for the progressive politics that you want to deliver.”
Driscoll said devolution gave English local authorities greater “agility” to respond to challenges and argued they produced better results than those made by central government.
Scotland should see more devolution out of Edinburgh, he argued, echoing arguments made by Scottish Labour.
But he said he doubted Anas Sarwar’s ability to achieve this, should Labour come to power in Westminster.
He argued it was easier to win concessions from central government if “you have a mandate from the people and you’re in a different party” rather than the same side, claiming they have “levers they can use against you”.
Driscoll added: “Anas is going to find it extraordinarily difficult to get anything through [Starmer].”
There have been previous suggestions that Starmer and Brown's visions for the constitutional report were different.
The Times reported there had been an “11th hour” row between the two before its publication and suggested Brown had wanted all recommendations to be adopted as party policy.
Starmer has since stressed the report will be subject to consultation.
Labour were approached for comment.
North of Tyne Mayor Jamie Driscoll is due to speak at the Break Up of Britain conference at the Assembly Halls in Edinburgh on Saturday. You can find out more about the event here.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel